Public Defender i.e. not a credible source of impartial opinion. Might as well ask a debtors' attorney about impartial Bankruptcy "fairness".
George Richards (FL bar), deputy chief of the juvenile division at the Hillsborough State Attorney's Office, said indigent youths are appointed an attorney unless they specifically decline one
At a trial yes, but at a reading of a sentence? - again, the article never states if a defendant is entitled to an attorney at this type of hearing. There are legal proceedings where sentencing can be handed down after a trial, without a court proceeding. If you don't have an attorney present in your house when you receive a sentence mailed to you can you appeal based on lack of representation? Even if you were represented in the trial?
Sentencing is often a formality. Frequently, the sentence is written by the judge in his or her chambers. The "hearing" where it is presented is not a "hearing" per se...it's just when the sentence is formally entered into the record and the defendant often has no right to say anything at that "hearing". Was this the case here? Was Richards statement being taken out of context?
There's a ton of questions this article never raises or answers or puts in their proper legal perspective.
Judy Estren (FL Bar), executive assistant public defender at the Pinellas-Pasco Public Defender's Office, said the co-defendant's attorney should have intervened. "I would have instructed my attorney to jump in."
Another "not credible" source....well, maybe credible but, hardly impartial.
These are all just questions that are popping into my mind because I was the legal assistant to the Head Counsel of Seafirst Bank for 5 years.
This article is sloppy as hell.
You're right. I have a suspicion this article may have been written as much to stir up somve criticism about "unqualified" Jeb Bush appointee as out of any concern about the defendent. Bet this reporter is looking for other similar incidents as we speak.