Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Psycho_Bunny
There's a ton of questions this article never raises or answers or puts in their proper legal perspective.

You're right. I have a suspicion this article may have been written as much to stir up somve criticism about "unqualified" Jeb Bush appointee as out of any concern about the defendent. Bet this reporter is looking for other similar incidents as we speak.

163 posted on 05/30/2002 7:57:49 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson, Psycho_Bunny
Waaay back in my post #17, I said this about the judge:

Mistake number three was not recognizing the reporter.

Not realizing there was a reporter in the courtroom, adding to that the ease in which one can get a copy of the tape of the hearing, plus the inexperience of the Judge (and I've seen bonehead moves from inexperienced judges--and some experienced ones--from all over the political spectrum) added up to one big mess for this judge. Now he's going to end up getting reversed by the Court of Appeals (and judges really truly hate that), they're be an order for a new hearing, and a probable investigation by the judicial review board, probably a referral to a remedial judge school....what a mess.

165 posted on 05/30/2002 9:25:36 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson