Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Face recognition kit fails in Fla airport
The Register ^ | May 27, 2002 | Thomas C Greene

Posted on 05/28/2002 10:14:14 AM PDT by the

Palm Beach International Airport security workers would be racking up heaps of overtime pay dealing with more than fifty false positives daily if their bosses were to install Visionics' terror-busting face recognition gear, the airport administrators have concluded.

The kit had been installed free of charge for a trial run during which the airport, not surprisingly, decided to test it on volunteers who work there over four weeks' time. Using fifteen volunteers and a data base of 250 snapshots, Palm Beach County administrators enjoyed a success rate of less than fifty per cent. That is, more than half the people the system should have flagged slipped past undetected.

The rate of false positives was also discouraging. The tests indicate that over fifty people would be falsely pegged at a security checkpoint handling five thousand passengers per day. The rate was approximately two to three false alarms per hour per checkpoint. We hardly need elaborate on the mayhem which would result from a gizmo that finds a terrorist every twenty minutes. It would be impossible to get a single plane off the ground in such circumstances.

Eyeglasses gave the system a great deal of difficulty, in spite of copious Visionics marketing hype denying this particular glitch. Small rotations of the head, fifteen to thirty degrees off the camera's focal point, also bamboozled it repeatedly, and the lighting had to be just right.

The ACLU obtained a copy of the Palm Beach report and has posted it here.

Meanwhile, the airport has since announced that it won't be adopting the Visionics handy terrorist catcher after all.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biometrics; falsesecurity; scam
This pretty much jives with other reports on the current "Not Ready for Prime Time" status of biometrics systems.
1 posted on 05/28/2002 10:14:18 AM PDT by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: boston_liberty
Yet another failed system.
2 posted on 05/28/2002 10:14:41 AM PDT by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
Best news I've heard all day.


3 posted on 05/28/2002 10:17:48 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the; summer
I knew they shouldn't have let Janet Reno be the first to try it out.
4 posted on 05/28/2002 10:17:55 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Oh, she has enough problems already! :)
5 posted on 05/28/2002 10:19:05 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the; boston_liberty
Eyeglasses gave the system a great deal of difficulty, in spite of copious Visionics marketing hype denying this particular glitch.

I'll keep wearing my Groucho Marx disguise kit, just in case.

6 posted on 05/28/2002 10:19:20 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the
>fifty people would be falsely pegged at a security

Sounds like 50 new lawsuits/day.

7 posted on 05/28/2002 10:21:17 AM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
The airport Public Information Officer apparently cannot spell the word "fourth."
8 posted on 05/28/2002 10:39:09 AM PDT by Eugene Tackleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
Isn't this the same system recently touted by the media and government as having been installed at the Statue of Liberty?

How is it that a system that has shown itself to be a failure is being adopted by a federal agency for security?
Maybe "feel good" public relations?
All show and no substance?
That would jibe with most of the "security measures" taken so far by the feds.

9 posted on 05/28/2002 11:59:15 AM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
Eyeglasses gave the system a great deal of difficulty, in spite of copious Visionics marketing hype denying this particular glitch.

I don't know why I know this....but when I first read about this system I had a mental image of the recognition software being distorted by bottlecap eyeware.

10 posted on 05/28/2002 12:05:39 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson