The mothers are victims and will have to live with what they have done.
You cannot have a 'difference of opinion' where killing is concerned. We have shaded so many wrongs in this society, soon nothing will be wrong. It will just be your opinion as to what is right or wrong.
Violence and maybe even the actions of these people are wrong. However, think about it. If you absolutely and with no doubt whatsoever, believed that they were murdering babies in that building, what would you do? And that is what they are doing - it is not just a difference of opinion, that is a beating heart and a life.
How do any of us sleep at night - both the ones who are pro-abortion and those of us who are against it and are doing nothing but posting on sites where we know we will be supported by the majority of posters. (The later was aimed at myself.)
Well stated, bravo! So killing of the uborn or the barely born is now "difference of opinion when life begins"? With euthanasia there is also "difference of opinion when life ends." Nutting but differences of opinion among educated people. It's all so relative, isn't it, and we're supposed to "celebrate our differences" and be "non-judgemental", aren't we? There is another name for these phenomena: decadence.
You bring about an interesting point. Hypothetically, suppose it was't unborn children, but, as an example, jewish people. Suppose that it wasn't illegal to kill jewish people and you knew that they were doing that inside the "clinic". If you truly believed in your heart that this was wrong, wouldn't you try everything in your power to stop it? Or what if it was black people, or red-headed people, or whatever? Hopefully you would try to save these peoples' lives.
I know this is a wild example, but I think it illustrates the point. Those of us that believe that there are truly babies being murdered in there, we should be doing more to stop it.
Not only is it a reasonable belief that a small clump of cells is NOT a human in any meaningful sense -- any other claim is a matter of religious faith ONLY. So yes, there is a very REASONABLE basis to disagree on the morality or immorality of abortion. Only the self-righteous holier-than-thou's preclude any possible disgreement from their revealed truth.
I don't think it's a difference of opinion where KILLING is concerned. It's more like a difference of opinion about WHEN LIFE BEGINS. Apparently, some people believe that a single cell is life and it would be wrong to kill it. Others believe that a single cell is not the equivilent of a human being. Those that are anti-abortion view what is being aborted as a life. Those that are pro-choice do not view it as a life.