Soooo, if you will take a cue from how the President handled the after-election fiasco, you will see that he holds his cards close to his chest. The repubs never warned the dems of what they were doing or what they were going to do. They all kept their mouths shut. As it should be. Because the repubs kept their mouths shut, I believe we had the advantage over the dems, in that they did not know what we were doing - in fact they said "Bush is in hiding at the ranch". Of course, Bush wasn't in hiding, and quite the contrary, Bush had people hard at work trying to keep Al Gore from stealing the election. But the dems said he was in hiding because they didn't know what he was doing. Bush did that on purpose to keep them off guard.
Sooooo, the fact YOU don't have any information - doesn't mean a thing.
But what about those being investigated? You don't honestly expect us to believe that among the HUNDREDS of democRATS that need to be questioned, many of whom will likely go to jail if this is pursued, some would not go public in an attempt to stop the investigation using "politics" and the media? NOTHING stops them or their lawyers from seeking favor with the media or friendly politicians. Sorry ... this defense of Bush is pretty transparent.
Furthermore, I don't expect that some of those who were wronged would remain quiet either. Again, there would be some indication that something was up. There isn't ... and if history is any guide ... that means nothing IS happening. As far as I'm concerned, you and the move-on'ers are just trying to use the ol' delay, delay, delay tactic. What's next ... deny, deny, deny? Some of the move-on'ers are already in that stage, by the way.