Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama
all soft tissue/DNA evidence was completely gone WE DON'T KNOW THAT FOR A FACT YET. REMEMBER THER ARE SOME THINGS THEY ARE NOT TELLING US???????

Oh, for some reason I thought that was one thing they DID tell us right off the bat. Maybe it was just the experts/talking heads on FOX that seemed sure there'd be no way to tell if she was pregnant or not with what they had to work with. Are you sure about that?

381 posted on 05/26/2002 6:31:19 PM PDT by MissCalico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]


To: MissCalico
I thought they stated they have recovered some bones. Wouldn't there still be marrow in the bones capable of producing DNA?
386 posted on 05/26/2002 6:35:50 PM PDT by fightu4it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]

To: MissCalico
We've been repeatedly told there are some things they are not telling us. There will still be DNA on clothing and possibly the ground or branches they found under the bones. I think that is why the "Arch. Dig" with anthropologist? We'll see? With all the bad PR, you can bet the DC police are hot to solve this one.
388 posted on 05/26/2002 6:36:15 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson