[TheOtherOne]

Not at all. My point is that her agenda, if any, will be REVEALED by the way the media treats her.

I disagree. I think her 'agenda' may be revealed. I do not think the way she may or may not be treated in the coming weeks is determinative of what that agenda may be.

[nathanbedford]

Look, I never used the word "Determine", you did. I spoke of "early indication" What in the hell is your point, any way?

Lets get to the issue: Her letter is filled with more than just facts about this intelligence failure. Reports indicate that it was chocked full of characterizations of upper level bungling and CYA. I am suspicious that she might have an agenda that is more than meets the eye. She may be a willing tool for a return to a Rino-like Department of Justice. Note her take on Ruby Ridge.

Now, can we move on?