Look, I never used the word "Determine", you did. I spoke of "early indication" What in the hell is your point, any way?
Lets get to the issue: Her letter is filled with more than just facts about this intelligence failure. Reports indicate that it was chocked full of characterizations of upper level bungling and CYA. I am suspicious that she might have an agenda that is more than meets the eye. She may be a willing tool for a return to a Rino-like Department of Justice. Note her take on Ruby Ridge.
Now, can we move on?
Please take a look at this article alleging that Clinton appointees in the DOJ are undermining Bush policies. Just yesterday the Washington Post reported that the "Joint Chiefs" were opposed to a war in Iraq. Note this article provides a possible explanation: These Clontonite think tanks purport to speak for the joint chiefs and are evidently accepted as a "source" to give the imprimator of the Joint Chiefs. But the purpose and effect is to undermine Bush. I am worried tht we will see parallels in the coming wars over the FBI.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/689293/posts