Posted on 05/23/2002 7:54:41 PM PDT by Jalapeno
New Yorker pleads with Monaco court not to prosecute him in arson deaths
|
||||||||||||
|
To get the Fire Dept there by setting off the fire alarm. The police were obviously not going to come help them. He held it up to the smoke alarm.
Bert's back?
JimRob tells no one anything when it comes to privacy issues. I'm still trying to find out how many daily .gov hits were on the Trannie threads. LOL!
My comment is based on common sense, Reg. They would be stupid to not monitor what the Maher family is doing. If I were in their place, I sure would. Maybe I give them too much credit?
As for the Maher family... What person in his right mind who is involved in a court case of this magnitude would make statements on a public forum involving their defense strategies? That's why I'm cringing every time people ask them things they shouldn't be commenting about in public.
See, that's how it works. I'm free to sit here and "speculate" until the cows come home. :-)
Nitz, I really didn't mean to run sinkspur off, but what's a man supposed to do?
To get some attention from someone. To bring help. The police were not responding. They were too busy down in the street playing Tiddlywinks.
No.
I'm sure if they decide they said something that shouldn't be said, they'll contact JimRob by sending a Private Reply to "Jim Robinson."
Fred, you didn't run me off. I got bitch-slapped by Nita over a few simple questions, the same questions, oddly enough, that american colleen is asking.
Nobody's jumping down her throat.
1.It's very easy to decide that Ted Maher is guilty if one has no time to read beyond what the NY Times & other prostituted media tell you
This is empty and lame without some indication of why "the NY Times & other prostituted media" decided to take Monaco's side and fabricate a bunch of highly negative stories about Maher. And why would they risk fabricating these stories and quotes from Maher acquaintances when these stories and quotes could so easily be refuted or confirmed? No. As much as I despise the NY Times and Time Magazine I don't think they just went and made up these stories.
2. It's understandable, especially when Ted comes out with a statement that seems to be saying he's not completely without fault.
"Seems to be saying"? C'mon... That is what the statement IS saying.
3. If he steadfastly continues to talk about "intruders," then Monaco is forced to deal with it accordingly. They must protect their "safe" image since their economy is based on tourism.
Sorry, no sale.
You really think that Monaco is afraid the world will wag its finger because of this once-a-decade murder case?
And Monaco is scared that its tourism economy might dry up??
So they go to all the time and effort to frame an innocent nobody - - to save their tourism industry.
You gotta be kidding me.
LOL! And I'll give you my firstborn child for that one. ;-)
You should lead by example.
Nobody's jumping down her throat. >>
See, this is where having a well-known reputation for being a butthead catches up with you, sink. It's just not believable when you try to be sincere.
Besides, colleen isn't cracking jokes about "flushing out the truth" about Safra's diarrhea problem.
I went to 414; where is there any reference to aristeides?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.