Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JW [and Sierra Club] VICTORY: COURT RULES CHENEY ENERGY TASK FORCE MUST TURN OVER INFORMATION
Judicial Watch ^ | 23 May 2002 | Judicial Watch

Posted on 05/23/2002 3:40:35 PM PDT by Amelia

JW VICTORY: COURT RULES CHENEY ENERGY TASK FORCE MUST TURN OVER INFORMATION

COURT: JUDICIAL WATCH LAWSUIT CAN PROCEED CONCERNING ENERGY TASK FORCE MEETINGS

BUSH ADMINISTRATION LOSES COURT EFFORT TO DISMISS LAWSUIT

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced that a federal court judge ruled today, over the objections of the Bush Administration, that Judicial Watch’s lawsuit against Vice President Cheney and his Energy Task Force can proceed to discovery. The Bush Administration had asked the court to dismiss Judicial Watch’s case and allow no discovery. The ruling, by The Honorable Emmet G. Sullivan, was thus a “devastating defeat” for the Bush Administration. Judicial Watch began its quest to obtain information about the Energy Task Force over one year ago and was force to file a lawsuit under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (open meetings law) when it was rebuffed in its requests for information by Vice President Cheney. Several months later, the Energy Task Force was sued by the Sierra Club, which is now a co-plaintiff in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit.

Judge Sullivan ruled today that the case will proceed and that he will order Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club to propose a discovery plan for the Cheney Energy Task Force.

“The court’s ruling lifts the veil of secrecy from Vice President Cheney’s Energy Task Force. Judicial Watch will now proceed to discovery about the Task Force’s composition and operations, and we intend to question individuals under oath,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheney; energy; judicialwatch; sierraclub
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 last
To: sinkspur
No, It's not about anything but funding Judicial Watch and his now accustomed lifestyle. At one time I believed he stood for honesty in Government. Can't believe I did that!
101 posted on 05/25/2002 1:54:42 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
In D.D.C. you can't generally "pick" your judge. Assignment of cases is supposed to be random. L. Klayman can't pick Judge Lamberth. Although he's gotten a lot of cases before him by persuading Judge Lamberth that certain cases were "related." footnote: recall there was a scandal recently because recent Clinton appointees got some politically charged cases non-randomly. Hence DC Circuit stepped in and reinforced that case assignment must be random.
102 posted on 05/25/2002 9:24:48 PM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson