Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bonaparte
Wow! You take quite a stroll with my suggestion that the Judge probably imposed an appropriate sentence. I was hardly suggesting that the teacher be applauded, or that she offer to gang bang the whole class!

The Judge doubtless investigated the possibility of any complications, such as you suggest, and concluded that the punishment was adequate from what she learned in the investigation. The circumstances in which a teenaged boy has his first sexual encounter are really not worth the time I have already spent trying to put a little perspective on this. My only purpose for even posting in this thread, which is not in my opinion a major news item, was to support the traditional view that separate standards do indeed pertain to male and female sexuality, and for very good reasons. Historically, very few ever suggested that male innocence was as important as female innocence; and very few ever tried to protect the former as avidly as the latter. We do not prepare our sons to be mothers.

I was not suggesting that school teachers should be having affairs with the students; only suggesting that this probable slut who wouldn't have even been hired in the days when the double standard was widely understood, is just a promiscuous woman in an loosely moralled age, and not public enemy number one.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

21 posted on 05/23/2002 1:48:45 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Ohioan
"The Judge doubtless investigated the possibility of any complications..."

I must have missed that part of the article. It sounds like your morals aren't too different from hers.

23 posted on 05/23/2002 1:57:29 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson