[WhiskeyPapa]

Since perpetuity is an imperfection in a freely entered union, a perpetual union made more perfect would not be perpetual

That would mean that no marriage could last, wouldn't it?

But some do.

This doesn't seem like blazingly piercing analysis on your part.

Walt

[Aurelius]

"That would mean that no marriage could last, wouldn't it?"

It would mean nothing of the sort. As usual your logic is fatally flawed. Perhaps your new screen name could be Fallacio.

[Aurelius]

"That would mean that no marriage could last, wouldn't it?"

In an attempt to enlighten you, although I would probably have more likelihood of success at bench-pressing an elephant, a marriage is not a perpetual compact, it ends with the lives of those who made the compact.