Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dubya is back in the saddle of sanity
Scotland on Sunday ^ | Sun 19 May 2002 | Gerald Warner

Posted on 05/18/2002 7:06:08 PM PDT by kaylar

Dubya is back in the saddle of sanity

Gerald Warner

DUBYA is in the frame - again. After a close season of eight months following September 11 the political opponents of George W Bush have decided that it is now safe to attack the commander-in-chief, using the original casus belli as the pretext for doing so.

It turns out it was not Osama bin Laden who killed 3,000 American citizens in New York: it was Dubya, who screwed up the intelligence report warning of the September 11 massacre and threw it to his dog to catch; in fact, Dubya screwed up - full stop.

It is this legend, crafted in the finest traditions of the Protocols of Zion and the Angel of Mons, that has reactivated the DNA of the dinosaurs. Once again the roar of Dimpledchadivarius Rex is heard in the Florida swamps and the committee rooms of Washington. As Dubya himself, in typically understated style, has observed, there is "a sniff of politics in the air".

Dubya will beat this rap - no sweat. "The president of the United States can’t be expected to be an intelligence analyst and a case officer," said Senator Bob Graham, the Democrat from Florida who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee. That is code for "Jeez! I saw that report too and nixed it."

The beneficent effect of this anti-Bush slander, for the Democrats, is to allow House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle to re-enter politics, however temporarily and squalidly. Meantime, while they are talking the talk, Dubya has been walking the walk.

‘At the election in 2000 America lost a playboy and gained a foreign policy’

At the presidential election in 2000 America lost a playboy and gained a foreign policy. Now, 18 months into the new presidency, the mosaic is taking shape. Kyoto protocols? I don’t think so. ABM Treaty? Strictly for recycling in the West Wing comfort room. International Criminal Court? Take a hike. A bilateral agreement on nuclear warhead reductions to help li’l ole Vladimir Putin save his face - and his job? Yeah, okay - can’t do any harm.

The extent to which Dubya has got every tree-hugger, lentil, fiscal redistributionist, nuclear unilateralist and world-government freak writhing in despair is testimony to the soundness of his policy.

The president will not cripple American industry by banning fossil fuel emissions; but he supports reafforestation as a means of absorbing carbon dioxide and ‘emissions trading’ - the free-market road to environmental improvement - much derided by the Left (because it is free-market) but which has already abolished acid rain in the US.

The first country that rushed ostentatiously to sign the Kyoto protocols was Romania, whose volcanic clouds of pollution can still be seen from outer space as clearly as in Ceausescu’s day. Bush has imposed reductions in emissions of nitrogen oxide, sulphur dioxide and mercury, of which you can inhale a lungful in downtown Bucharest.

Earlier this month, Dubya told the International Criminal Court (ICC) that Uncle Sam would not be joining the party. Clinton had signed up to it in the same last-minute flurry of paperwork that gave pardons to Marc Rich et al. The court was established by a treaty among 66 nations negotiated in Rome in 1998 and will commence work at The Hague on July 1.

It is a travesty of justice. An unaccountable prosecutor will be elected for nine years, with absolute discretion to initiate investigations into genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and (wait for it) ‘the crime of aggression’ - ie any action taken by America and its allies. Any remote possibility of US adherence was blown away by the legal writs issued in France and elsewhere against former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.

In 1803, the decision in the case of Marbury v Madison established the supremacy of the US Supreme Court - a judicial supremacy that surely cannot be expatriated. The ICC derives from the United Nations, whose Security Council includes Red China, a régime that has 65 million murders to its credit. Will the ICC prosecute President Jiang Zemin? The clever money thinks not.

Finally came the bilateral arms agreement with Russia. It is a spring cleaning, with both sides scrapping excess nuclear ordnance. It is Putin’s reward for letting the ABM treaty go down the tubes without throwing a temper tantrum and it keeps him in countenance at home. Putin, in response, will not demur at the Baltic States joining Nato in November.

The Bush foreign policy is not isolationism: it is independent global engagement, realpolitik with a human face. That is exactly the posture we should welcome from the world’s last remaining superpower.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: gwb; icc; kyoto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: right_to_defend
Hah! Guess my post to you trying to sell you on the SOS site was wasted ; you probably knew of it long before I did, perhaps even from its 'dead tree' days. (Newpapers? Magazines? What're those?)
21 posted on 05/18/2002 7:42:24 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
I'm in 9th grade and studying Marbury currently. The teacher prizes herself on being a "moderate" I'm writing the class paper on the unconsitutionality of Roe v. Wade. :)

She openly admits to loving Judicial activism. I can't understand why leftists who love the "will of the people" (gore) won't restore power to them

The whole concept of Judicial review seems inherently flawed, because of the power that it allows the court to have. UNBRIDLED power! Strike down a law if ya don't like it.... use the due process clause and case law as your reasons. Nice to hear I'm the only one who opposes Marbury.

22 posted on 05/18/2002 7:43:28 PM PDT by katherineisgreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
The only bad thing about that site is its once a week status. That, and Gerald Warner isn't in every edition. But it's still one of my favorites.
23 posted on 05/18/2002 7:43:32 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
And come to think of it, Rik must be the managing editor of The Guardian. hehe
24 posted on 05/18/2002 7:43:51 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kaylar;Big Steve;deport;blackie;Deb;Howlin;GUIDO
A good read! Thanks. I've always loved the Scots!
25 posted on 05/18/2002 7:45:07 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
That's why you like me, I'm Scotch-Irish!
26 posted on 05/18/2002 7:47:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
Wonderful post! This writer describes our Super Dubya perfectly!


27 posted on 05/18/2002 7:48:07 PM PDT by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katherineisgreat
Give 'er heck! The leftists are convinced that every 'advance' in civil rights was brought about by judicial activism and/or government coercion against the retrograde rednecks fighting for the status quo. Upholding strict constitutionality against that sort of mindset is a challenge. Good luck.
28 posted on 05/18/2002 7:48:51 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
I'm in 9th grade and studying Marbury currently. The teacher prizes herself on being a "moderate" I'm writing the class paper on the unconsitutionality of Roe v. Wade. :)

She openly admits to loving Judicial activism. I can't understand why leftists who love the "will of the people" (gore) won't restore power to them

The whole concept of Judicial review seems inherently flawed, because of the power that it allows the court to have. UNBRIDLED power! Strike down a law if ya don't like it.... use the due process clause and case law as your reasons. Nice to hear I'm the only one who opposes Marbury.

29 posted on 05/18/2002 7:50:12 PM PDT by katherineisgreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
Love the graphix!
30 posted on 05/18/2002 7:50:14 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: all
sorry for the double post. my browser hit back.
31 posted on 05/18/2002 7:51:04 PM PDT by katherineisgreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: katherineisgreat
Stuff happens! Anyway, good luck with your teacher ; hopes he gives grades fairly, not according to whether the student regurgitates propaganda.
32 posted on 05/18/2002 7:53:16 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
I have to say that I honestly could not blame anyone for doing whatever is necessary to keep their countrymen from being brought before the ICC. I don't include just Americans, but anyone. No one should have to be brought before such an elitist institution where they will be cattle for the slaughter. Even the most biggoted nations would give a so-called war criminal a fairer trial in their courts than the ICC would. War is a crime, to create a new concept called a "war-crime" is pointless. The only war criminals are the politicians that start wars. All wars are avoidable. Stupid politicians that are unwilling to act with half the intelligence of their constituents are the root cause of war.
33 posted on 05/18/2002 7:53:40 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
Bump.
34 posted on 05/18/2002 7:54:02 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
Very true, and after Durban, I don't think anyone can expect the ICC to be anything but (at best) a powerless "feel good" farce, and at worst the main force for tyranny to come along in quite a few decades.
35 posted on 05/18/2002 7:56:38 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
hehehehe! And don't you just love the sound of those bagpipes?!
36 posted on 05/18/2002 7:59:42 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Good article. And from Scotland, imagine that.

Would you allow me to second that...

37 posted on 05/18/2002 8:00:29 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
LOL!!! So true.
38 posted on 05/18/2002 8:05:53 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue; Howlin
The call of the clans is one which echoes down through the generations. McLean of Lochbuie here...a small but proud group, and I LOVE the sound of the pipes!

Howlin..welcome back! We missed you!

39 posted on 05/18/2002 8:06:45 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
I doubt it will last long. The first time it takes away a popular political leader or politician will be its last. Milosovic was not popular with the Serbs because he was a hardline Socialist in a nation that wanted free elections and a more capitalistic economy. Wait till they take an Ariel Sharon away. They would be so lucky if an extremely bloody operation to extract him from the ICC was the worst thing that happens to them. I could see WWIII being brought about by the ICC more easily than I could by the Middle East. The first time an American, Russian or Chinese President is arrested in Europe and taken to the ICC will be the time when the bulk of Europe gets a feel for just how great the military power distance is between a pissant socialist state and a superpower.
40 posted on 05/18/2002 8:09:06 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson