[BJClinton]

Direct cut-n-paste. They've changed their website. It was probably a typo, they were quoting a WP article. Perhaps a Freudian slip?

[pepsi_junkie]

Direct cut-n-paste. They've changed their website. It was probably a typo, they were quoting a WP article. Perhaps a Freudian slip?

I dont know about the typo theory. The current article has several paragraphs discussing the controversy about President Bush. Bush this, Bush that. Then they slip in a reveltion that "the president" had been briefed back in 1998. Originally it had said President Bush and it was at the front of the article. Now it was moved to the end (after all the Bush discussion) and rather than change "President Bush" to "President Clinton" they just made it "the president". If that isnt blatant bias to create a perception that Bush has known far more than he tells then it is certainly incredible sloppiness. Calling it a typo doesnt cut it.