Worse, it has a lengthy lead in about Bush this, Bush that. Then it throws in the above disclosure that "the president" had been briefed in 1998. Taken in context it clearly implies Bush was briefed. The blatant reference was removed, the subtle one remains.
... The Washington Post reported Saturday that a 1998 top-secret briefing memo to the president was entitled, "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In U.S" and focused mainly on past efforts by the alleged terrorist mastermind to infiltrate the U.S. and hit targets here.You got that right ... they went from "President Bush" to "the 'President was briefed in 1998" in the next few paragraphs and then "Mr. Bush". I believe this deserves some major Freeping. Even something as subtle as that counts.The document, known as the President's Daily Briefing, underscored that bin Laden and his followers hoped to "bring the fight to America," in part as retaliation for U.S. missile strikes on al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan in 1998, the Post quotes knowledgeable sources as saying.
Mr. Bush had specifically asked for an intelligence analysis of possible al Qaeda attacks within the U.S., because most of the information presented to him over the summer about al Qaeda focused on threats against U.S. targets overseas, sources told the Post.
It seems as if the presstitutes have noticed now that they've opened a can of worms that they definitely don't like the look of; look at the dates in that article ... 1995, 1996 1998 and 1999. Who was President then? The man they protected and called God ... his Perfectness, the Lord President William Jefferson Clinton.
What does the President know and when did he know it, indeed. Unfortunately for them, they're discovering that the question should rightfully be asked of the President during those years since that President actually did recieve a warning that specifically spoke of aircraft being used as missiles. What did he do about it?