Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Intercepting Messages Hinting at a New Attack
The New York Times ^ | 5/18/02 (for editions of 5/19/02) | James Risen and David Johnston

Posted on 05/18/2002 10:31:35 AM PDT by GeneD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-294 next last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: rosebud
Both Clintons march to the drums of their socialist/marxist masters. Hitlery, of course, is one of the most admired propagandists in the world. The shame of the Demoncrap party is that its goals are ONE with the Terrorists!
82 posted on 05/18/2002 12:01:11 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ZeitgeistSurfer
Hah Exactly.. Its time to profile and to let these "people" know that one more attack means the end of the culture they know and love.
83 posted on 05/18/2002 12:03:03 PM PDT by eXe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Consider this scenario: The Bush team knows there has been an increase in "traffic" just like before the 9/11 attack, so they first get the story out about how they didn't do enough (so the dems say) to prevent 9/11, then they put this out, so that we the pipple now cry, DO something -- profile, deport, get SERIOUS! Now they can do it and what is the media going to say?

Nah, they aren't that clever.

84 posted on 05/18/2002 12:08:33 PM PDT by alley cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
OOOPPPPSSSS....Yep, you're right JOE McCarthy!!!! Need MORE COFFEE!!!
85 posted on 05/18/2002 12:15:02 PM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rosebud
He was let into this country over the objections of the CIA.
Is it possible that President Clinton is a mole? Food for thought.

Are you serious????

86 posted on 05/18/2002 12:17:24 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog

No Doubt... it's gonna be terrible...




What really bothers me is that the Democrats are "dancing around" spending all their time trying to make political hay, while we are in a real serious military situation. When John Ashcroft made his statement, the media played it from a POLITICAL angle. Not at all listening to what he was saying. He was deathly serious. This is dangerious times for all AMERICANs.


And, treasonous times for anyone to cause us to direct and misdirect our attention away from the problem at hand. Sure we need to find out why our FBI and CIA have been so poor in their performances, but the media and democrats are being really treasonous in trying to make it a White House issue.


87 posted on 05/18/2002 12:19:19 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam
I say, give 'em the Holy War they seek!

Right! Because that's exactly what this is, and there can be only one victor.

Destroy them all!

88 posted on 05/18/2002 12:23:17 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GirlyGirl
Very good point! Things would be a bit easier to sort out without the millions of illegals clogging things up.
89 posted on 05/18/2002 12:25:47 PM PDT by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
It's obvious that the feds don't have a freakin' clue what is coming, or when it is coming, or how it will be carried out.

Several incidents have already occurred, and they are being swept under the rug.

Now, since the feds don't have a clue, it's pretty much up to "we the people" to take care ourselves and our families and friends. This means having enough food and water around in case things hit the fan. It also means being well-armed.

One of the best things that the Congress could do immediately is to allow for federal CCW reciprocity. State legislatures could also relax their CCW restrictions on where people can carry. This would increase our national security, and lessen the chance of a successful Al Queda attack. President Bush could show some leadership on this issue, if his handlers would let him.

90 posted on 05/18/2002 12:33:45 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Washington_minuteman
What the hell are you talking about? If you think government brnigs safety, you ARE an idiot. If you prefer security over freedom, you deserve neither.

I suggest you take your hot-shot ass back up and read a little, smart-ass.

91 posted on 05/18/2002 12:37:58 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blam
I say, give'm the Holy War they seek!
Finally, someone agrees with me!
92 posted on 05/18/2002 12:38:41 PM PDT by RebelDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny), right_to_defend
Maybe you could call your airlines Christian Airlines, and the muslims would stay away. Get a Reverend or Priest that knew how to fly, staffed with a few nuns or such, and advertise pork with every meal. Could the ACLU still touch you??

Simply advertise "First Class Service," with "all seats covered with soft pig skin leather." That would keep PETA off of the planes, too.

93 posted on 05/18/2002 12:38:46 PM PDT by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: kcrack
US don’t need NATO to patrol its sky

That depends..on what our own AWACS fleet is up to. Actually I think we could cover the US pretty well with ground based radars and National Guard/Reserve controllers. A few areas lack ground based coverage though, so a couple of AWACS are still needed.

94 posted on 05/18/2002 12:45:50 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rosebud
"Is it possible that President Clinton is a mole?"

Forget possible and try highly probable ...check out Alamo-Girl.com

And then check out below to see how the other hot crisis is connected too! http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3b555c262d74.htm (Hillary supposedly did her senior paper on Gramsci.)
95 posted on 05/18/2002 12:55:44 PM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
OK, Daschle, Gephardt, Clinton, McKinney -- what do we do? You four seem to have all the answers, how do we stop this? Because if you don't suggest something, it'll be on your head.

Exactly. Let's see how good they are at "connecting the dots". (And don't forget Alan Keyes, who's been ripping into Bush and Rice himself.)

96 posted on 05/18/2002 12:59:09 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
We need to forward this to Daschle, Gephardt, et al en masse.
97 posted on 05/18/2002 1:05:22 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
They're out there on the Senate floor screaming for transparency, that's why!
98 posted on 05/18/2002 1:07:00 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
That thought has crossed my mind as well.
99 posted on 05/18/2002 1:07:45 PM PDT by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I posted in another thread information about Congress in Yr 2000. It reads like it happened last week. Congress knew a lot more than they admit. It is a long read, but worth a scan: What did Congress know?
100 posted on 05/18/2002 1:08:35 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson