Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Anyone know if the BCC Newsnight has a transcript of Dan?
1 posted on 05/17/2002 9:38:53 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LarryLied
It is to laugh.

Blather wouldn't know good journalism if it sat up and slapped him in the face.

2 posted on 05/17/2002 9:50:42 PM PDT by Avg_Joe_6-pack_Couch_Potatoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
"There has never been an American war, small or large, in which access has been so limited as this one," Rather said, adding that he was sorry to say that the American people have accepted these limitations.

DAN IS A LIAR. In World War II all war reporters were drafted into the army. They were forced to wear military uniforms with out badge of rank and call all officers SIR. They had the rank of a 2nd John. But were were considered to have less seniority than any commissioned 2nd john entited to wear the badge of rank. They reporters had to be saluted by enlisted men, but could not command them.

All NEWS reports had to be cleared by a military censor..Yes that was their title MILITARY Censor. A reporter who filed a story with his paper nor station, with out having it censored first was court marshalled. They would be tried by a military courts marshall. They were also paid by the military. They were in fact drafted members of the us army. In the European theater they has what ever access Eisenhower said they had today. And they had to get Military approval to report anything. In the Pacific theatre MacArthur was their boss. He was their commander.

War correspondents in world war II came under the UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. That means they had no constitutional rights to civilian justice. If Eisenhower or MacArthur wanted one of them shot, he would have been shot. That is the freedom they had in WWII.

That is the truth and Rather is a liar. He just thinks that you are too dump to know he is lying.


3 posted on 05/17/2002 9:54:24 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
The "limitations" we American people "have accepted" is that RATHER considers himself a journalist and we have to constantly look elsewhere for REAL REPORTING!!!!
7 posted on 05/17/2002 10:14:35 PM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
Dan Rather, one of the most respected and well-known broadcasters in the United States said last night that the mood of extreme patriotism engulfing the country since 11 September had stopped the media asking difficult questions of America's leaders

Yeah, Dan, like the "difficult questions" you always had for the Scumbag administration, or the "difficult questions" you and your liberal ilk were always asking Senator Bride of Scumbag, before the 9/11 attacks. Okay, Dan.

8 posted on 05/17/2002 10:16:01 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
Well Danny boy doesn't have to worry. No one would accuse him of having too much patriotism!
Of course, those of us who live in the US know what he really means, Too many people approve of the job President Bush is doing! That is what really bothers Dan the Man!
9 posted on 05/17/2002 10:18:53 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
This t*rd has gotten too big for his britches!
10 posted on 05/17/2002 10:21:03 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
adding that he was sorry to say that the American people have accepted these limitations.

If it means you are limited in what you can lie about Dan, we're all for it.

11 posted on 05/17/2002 10:26:30 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
"And one finds oneself saying, 'I know the right question, but you know what? This is not exactly the right time to ask it," said Rather.

As the BBC interview was being shown in Britain, the White House was facing questions about its decision not to alert the American public in the weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks that Osama bin Laden wanted to hijack U.S. airplanes.

Rather said that "patriotism run amok" is making it difficult for journalists to provide Americans with all the information they need about the war in Afghanistan and to hold the Bush administration accountable.

The left wing media is frustrated. Rather and his biased media buddies would like to turn the public against the Bush administration but the people can no longer swallow their liberal tripe. Not because of patriotism, or lack of access to information, or censorship. The public overwhelmingly supports Bush. They believe that he is doing exactly what needs to be done to defeat our enemies.

None of the innuendos, claims of corruption, inside deals, or trumped up scandals have stuck to the Bush administration and it is driving the liberal press crazy. Fewer people are listening and they are getting desperate. It's conservatism run amok Dan, get used to it.

13 posted on 05/17/2002 10:33:30 PM PDT by eggman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
I love watching liberal fascist scum like DR whistle as they walk past their own collective grave...Reading this makes me want to go hang out in front of the local NBC affiliate and just say

"Freerepublic.com is where I get all my news, have you heard of them? Oh its fantastic! You should check it out!"

In front of every newsie as he slumps up to his office in terror of finding a pink slip in his Demoroidally correct in-basket...*EVIL glee begin!

Great Post LL!

16 posted on 05/17/2002 10:54:04 PM PDT by sleavelessinseattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
Dan is a blowhole. How can a liberal socialist journalist be patriotic?
17 posted on 05/17/2002 11:09:03 PM PDT by Draakan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
Good. Let patriotism keep running amok.
20 posted on 05/17/2002 11:28:59 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
"patriotism run amok"

Aw come on Dan. If you ask me, we're just barely gettin warmed up here. I want to see youngsters with belt-fed weapons marching in parades shouting out for God and country! Shoutin the 'Pledge, and praying in schools.

Stay over there, Dan, you can wet the bed with the best of 'em. And we don't want your stink around here. You have caused more division and repulsive apathetic doubt than you've reported news in your shallow self aggrandizing, and appeals for notoriety. And Sir, your swill makes hog wash appealing

21 posted on 05/17/2002 11:32:26 PM PDT by kickme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
This from the King and Emperor of the PC speak gag rules. I'm sorry he is so shallow that it took 9-11 to cause patriotism to swell in his empty grinch chest. Most likely it's gas.

The only reason his venom is kept in those fangs, is that he fears being drummed out of television for his anti-American retoric at this time in our history. It has recently happened to better men than him, that scab Bill Mahler for instance.

23 posted on 05/17/2002 11:51:54 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
What a scummy puke Blather is. "Look at ME!" he's really saying. Must have taken Xlinton lessons.

Vote.com has up a poll on this subject. Send Blather a message!

Rather says patriotism infects news

Look at the loaded terms, people! "Patriotism run amok" reminds me of the commie statement, "Freedoms are precious, that's why we must restrict them." The self-proclaimed elite ALWAYS know what's best for us, of course!

This "patriotism" is too independent, too likely to cause people to make their own informed choices, without "spin" to help the unwashed rubes find their undeserving way to the Great Guru Dan...

26 posted on 05/18/2002 1:48:00 AM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
If C.B.S. is wondering why they are losing viewers look at two things: The news division is terrible.

The entertainment division is terrible.

Other then that everything is ok there. I wouldn't trust Dan Blather to give me any news. If Rather said the sky is blue I'd go outside and check.

27 posted on 05/18/2002 1:55:43 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied
And one finds oneself saying, 'I know the right question, but you know what? This is not exactly the right time to ask it," said Rather.

The right question, Dan, was: "why did you rape Juanitta Broderick?"

Guess you never found the right time to ask that, did you Dan?
28 posted on 05/18/2002 2:02:03 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LarryLied

Rather said that "patriotism run amok" is making it difficult for journalists to provide Americans with all the information they need about the war in Afghanistan and to hold the Bush administration accountable.

What a whiner. Dan Rather and company tried their hardest to knock President Bush's high approval rating down but failed and now he's all but pleading with the people to dump on the President.

30 posted on 05/18/2002 3:22:15 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson