Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/17/2002 8:34:21 PM PDT by tomball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: tomball
"That's why I did everything I could to get bin Laden, because I thought he was a dangerous man," he said. "And as we've seen, he is."

He is delusional, a sociopath. He believes that just because he says something, that it will be accepted as truth. And given the complicity of the duplicitous media, he has good reason to believe so. The "dangerous man" was the "impeached one". We will be paying the price for his "service" for a long time to come. He will never go away. I wish for once that members of Congress, and others who are in the know, would finally disclose ALL of the intel on this insufferable sc*mb*g. If only to let the nation move forward.

53 posted on 05/17/2002 10:09:02 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
What did Clinton not know, and when did he not know it?
54 posted on 05/17/2002 10:21:14 PM PDT by stiga bey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
ping!
55 posted on 05/17/2002 10:28:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; stanz; RaceBannon; Cacique; KLT; Exit148; ELS; evilC; DoctorRaoul...
Lying scumbag Klintoon alert!
57 posted on 05/17/2002 10:55:50 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
" 'That has nothing to do with intelligence,' said Clinton. . ."

Huh?
58 posted on 05/17/2002 11:06:04 PM PDT by DennisR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
Not for commercial use. Solely to be used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion.

The Washington Times
December 10, 2001, Monday, Final Edition COMMENTARY; Pg. A17

Clinton legacy addendum
Mona Charen

His beaming smile made it to the front page for the first time in months. Alas for him it was only the front page of the Style section in The Washington Post. There he was, shovel in hand, laying the groundwork for his presidential library in Little Rock, Ark.

But the groundwork for his place in history has already been laid - and no gleaming edifice of stone and glass will obscure it. We have witnessed, in the days since September 11, new but unsurprising evidence of what a sociopath we had as our leader for eight years. And we have learned that his immaturity, shallowness and thermonuclear self-centeredness had consequences for the nation that were tragic and very nearly catastrophic.

While the sane world grieved at the savagery of the September 11 calamity, Mr. Clinton confided to a friend his regret. What? That he hadn't done more to protect the nation? That he underestimated the danger? No. He "regretted" that this tragedy hadn't happened on his watch, and that he had therefore lost an opportunity for "greatness." Even by the vanity standards applicable to movie stars and tenors, that qualifies as pathology.

But far more damning than his solipsistic response to the nation's anguish is the abundant evidence that he did almost nothing to protect us while he had the chance. In 1996, as Monsoor Ijaz relates in the Los Angeles Times, Sudan offered to extradite Osama bin Laden to the United States. The Clinton administration declined the offer.

Demonstrating the lawyerly folly of the administration's approach to international terror, former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger explained that the United States feared it did not have the evidence to convict him in our courts. Even as late as 2000 - after the two African embassy bombings and well after it was known that bin Laden was behind the Khobar Towers attack - an Arab nation approached the Clinton White House through Mr. Ijaz, offering to collar bin Laden and eventually deliver him to the United States. The Arab nation, which Mr. Ijaz declined to name, also offered to give key information to the United States about Islamic Jihad, Hamas and Hezbollah - the groups that taught bin Laden the terror ropes. Again the Clinton administration failed to act.


Even after the USS Cole was struck and nearly sunk in 2000, Mr. Clinton was too busy chasing the chimera of a grand Middle East peace to deal with those he knew had attacked us. Hoping for a secure place in history for William J. Clinton, he declined to do anything that might annoy or unsettle the Islamic world.

(snip)



60 posted on 05/17/2002 11:19:21 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
Clinton's aides knew about the serious national threats and still trashed the White House, even damaging computers by removing all of the "W's", putting our country at a still greater risk. Despicable.
64 posted on 05/18/2002 1:29:54 AM PDT by Atlantian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
Spin Insanity Courtesy of the Left

Clinton's Bin Laden GATE - Mother of all Scandals
65 posted on 05/18/2002 3:10:25 AM PDT by Republican_Strategist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
Gee, Bill just absolved GW of any mishandling of this by clearing himself, didn't he? Hahaha! Life must be very frustrating for Billy-boy.
69 posted on 05/18/2002 5:48:09 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
"Former President Clinton said Friday he knew about the dangerous potential of Osama bin Laden but discounted reports that a 1999 analysis should have alerted his administration to a terrorist attack on the scale of the Sept. 11 attacks... 'Let me remind you that's why I attacked his training camp...'"

Wow, Billy, you attacked his camp in '98 because of a report you received in '99? Who knew Bubba was psychic?

70 posted on 05/18/2002 5:49:17 AM PDT by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
"Let me remind you that's why I attacked his training camp and why I asked the Pakistanis to go get him, and why we contracted with some people in Afghanistan to go get him, because we thought he was dangerous," he said. "But that's not the same thing as having intelligence about specific things."

He's such a piece of $hit!

71 posted on 05/18/2002 6:06:44 AM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
When are the democrats going to learn that anything they accuse Bush of even thinking about doing, Clinton had ALREADY DONE it and gettin' ready to do it again.

Their defense of him makes it possible for all who follow to get away with anything.

73 posted on 05/18/2002 6:43:22 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
Watch out, X42's lips are moving again. And you know what that means.
86 posted on 05/18/2002 10:13:14 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: clinton haters
Would you sign in please.
88 posted on 05/18/2002 10:43:48 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tomball
"That's why I did everything I could to get bin Laden"

Yeah, right! And is that why Clinton REFUSED to take Osama when the Sudan had him?? Is that really "doing everything you can to get him"?? I don't think so!

95 posted on 05/18/2002 5:28:44 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson