Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tomball
Not for commercial use. Solely to be used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion.

The Washington Times
December 10, 2001, Monday, Final Edition COMMENTARY; Pg. A17

Clinton legacy addendum
Mona Charen

His beaming smile made it to the front page for the first time in months. Alas for him it was only the front page of the Style section in The Washington Post. There he was, shovel in hand, laying the groundwork for his presidential library in Little Rock, Ark.

But the groundwork for his place in history has already been laid - and no gleaming edifice of stone and glass will obscure it. We have witnessed, in the days since September 11, new but unsurprising evidence of what a sociopath we had as our leader for eight years. And we have learned that his immaturity, shallowness and thermonuclear self-centeredness had consequences for the nation that were tragic and very nearly catastrophic.

While the sane world grieved at the savagery of the September 11 calamity, Mr. Clinton confided to a friend his regret. What? That he hadn't done more to protect the nation? That he underestimated the danger? No. He "regretted" that this tragedy hadn't happened on his watch, and that he had therefore lost an opportunity for "greatness." Even by the vanity standards applicable to movie stars and tenors, that qualifies as pathology.

But far more damning than his solipsistic response to the nation's anguish is the abundant evidence that he did almost nothing to protect us while he had the chance. In 1996, as Monsoor Ijaz relates in the Los Angeles Times, Sudan offered to extradite Osama bin Laden to the United States. The Clinton administration declined the offer.

Demonstrating the lawyerly folly of the administration's approach to international terror, former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger explained that the United States feared it did not have the evidence to convict him in our courts. Even as late as 2000 - after the two African embassy bombings and well after it was known that bin Laden was behind the Khobar Towers attack - an Arab nation approached the Clinton White House through Mr. Ijaz, offering to collar bin Laden and eventually deliver him to the United States. The Arab nation, which Mr. Ijaz declined to name, also offered to give key information to the United States about Islamic Jihad, Hamas and Hezbollah - the groups that taught bin Laden the terror ropes. Again the Clinton administration failed to act.


Even after the USS Cole was struck and nearly sunk in 2000, Mr. Clinton was too busy chasing the chimera of a grand Middle East peace to deal with those he knew had attacked us. Hoping for a secure place in history for William J. Clinton, he declined to do anything that might annoy or unsettle the Islamic world.

(snip)



60 posted on 05/17/2002 11:19:21 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nita Nupress
I still think this goes even deeper. Did Bin Laden donate to Clinton's library? Did Bin Laden donate to Hillary's campaign? Something is very fishy here.
74 posted on 05/18/2002 6:48:17 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Nita Nupress
Good find.
76 posted on 05/18/2002 7:47:48 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Nita Nupress
former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger explained that the United States feared it did not have the evidence to convict him in our courts.

The Clinton Legacy

94 posted on 05/18/2002 3:06:21 PM PDT by JPJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson