No one denies any of that. He is moral, and a big part of his morality thinks that sharing the wealth is an ethical thing to do. One need not be a Marxist to believe in this sort of thing, for verification, read up on Huey Long.
His religious character is fine, so far as it goes. He's not the sort to molest school girls in the Oval Office. He quit drinking in his middle age. Fine. What this tells me is that he waited until he was forty years old to grow up and quit acting like a kid.
And he is a uniter. The trouble is, he wants to unite the continental US with Mexico, and the US economy with Red China. The advisability of that is open to question, to say the least. He wants us all to quit confronting ghetto trash, perverts, and con artists bent on the deconstruction, disassembly, and destruction of the USA and the ideology which establishes it as the last, best hope for the human race.
With things like these being touted as conservatism, what is there left for conservatives to conserve these days, pray tell?
I would think someone wanting to "share the wealth" would not be for tax cuts to give the people their money back.
"waited to 40 years old to grow up"
That's a cheap shot. If that was true - how can he start at 40 and become a governor two terms and a president? Why would we elect one who waited until 40 to grow up - that sounds like Gore or Clinton.
I would think he just probably got offtrack but had the guts to get himself back on track, to learn that he is unable to drink and from then on stayed away from it totally. That sounds pretty courageous to me and pretty self-disciplined.
He wants us all to quit confronting ghetto trash, perverts, and con artists bent on the deconstruction, disassembly, and destruction of the USA and the ideology which establishes it as the last, best hope for the human race.
Have no idea what you are referring to here.
Uniter?
A uniter is what we need as the superpower. We have to lead - and people are led more easily with a person that joins with them as they go in the right direction rather than one telling them what to do.
Frankly I agree with his philosophy that the more you trade with countries like China - the more our values creep into their culture and they eventually come to depend on the trade and will be hesitant to do things that will disrupt that source of income. The Chinese people will become familiar with the free world.
Also - I think the stronger our ties are with Mexico and Canada the better.
Still dealing in total absurdities I see. Can you offer proof of these ridiculous charges? Why not try to state a fact every now and then just for practice. Or have you none to state?