Skip to comments.
Ancient grave discovered
Globe and mail (Toronto) ^
| May 16, 2002
Posted on 05/17/2002 12:33:42 PM PDT by Clive
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
The grave is obviously that of one of my forefathers and I want the remains put back exactly where they were found, together with all his possessions, and the whole area declared a holy site.
These latecomers, Romans, Danes, Saxons and Normans have got to learn to respect aboriginals.
1
posted on
05/17/2002 12:33:42 PM PDT
by
Clive
To: Clive
Probably killed at a football match.
2
posted on
05/17/2002 12:37:56 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
To: Clive;Blam
Looks somewhat like an article posted yesterday.
To: Clive
The grave is obviously that of one of my forefathersGood one, Clive! LOL!
4
posted on
05/17/2002 1:19:18 PM PDT
by
maica
To: maica
Interesting!
To: Clive
Wait until we sue for repatriations for land seized afer the first Civil War in 1776.
6
posted on
05/17/2002 2:54:15 PM PDT
by
ijcr
To: Clive
Since the date of arrival of the Celts in the British Isles is very much open to dispute, and could have been either before or after the date of this grave, it would be very interesting to know whether or not the grave is Celtic.
To: Clive
Found near Stonehenge? Was he a Wiccan?
To: Clive
How old does a grave have to be in order for digging it up is considered archeology instead of grave robbing?
9
posted on
05/17/2002 2:57:55 PM PDT
by
aomagrat
To: AppyPappy
bttt
To: Clive
I hate to say this Clive but if you knew how silly you sound claiming relations to a 4000 year old skeleton, i would have to say you haven't progress very far up the evolutionary ladder!
11
posted on
05/17/2002 3:41:46 PM PDT
by
GeorgeHL
To: GeorgeHL
Hey newbie, learn to recognize mockery when it slaps you in the face.
12
posted on
05/17/2002 4:10:46 PM PDT
by
metesky
To: aomagrat
How old does a grave have to be for it to be considered archeology? I know that the Titanic visits were considered archeology. The "unknown soldier" from vietnam is known, or could be from DNA. I wonder what the rules are..... good point....
To: donmeaker
There are Prehistoric burials and historic burials and they do both.
14
posted on
05/17/2002 5:58:39 PM PDT
by
ruoflaw
To: metesky
I didn't know I had to have tenure here to use a little ironic humor.
15
posted on
05/18/2002 10:36:36 AM PDT
by
GeorgeHL
To: GeorgeHL
Didn't know you were being humorous. Duh!
I've been wrong before and I've been slapped before.
;O)
16
posted on
05/18/2002 11:47:28 AM PDT
by
metesky
To: GeorgeHL
I recognized your ironic humor right away...I bet you are Irish!
17
posted on
05/18/2002 12:21:14 PM PDT
by
ruoflaw
To: metesky
SOK! No offense meant and none taken! We don't want to get like the laughless liberals and lose our sense of humor!
18
posted on
05/19/2002 2:41:30 PM PDT
by
GeorgeHL
To: ruoflaw
faith and begorrah! where did you ever get that idea.ping
19
posted on
05/19/2002 2:42:54 PM PDT
by
GeorgeHL
To: Clive
I took a class a couple of quarters ago, intro to Archaeology.
Very interesting, got a B+ in the class...
What I did realize, was that I want to be cremated when I finally kack.
I don't want to be dug up, my skull put on a shelf in some laboratory for study at a later date...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson