Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney says U.S. faces threat of worse attack
Rueters ^

Posted on 05/16/2002 5:52:25 PM PDT by Dallas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Darlin'
My choice for quote of the day is post 36
41 posted on 05/16/2002 6:58:11 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: blueriver
Re:"The war on terrorism is a big farce."

What's the color of the night time sky on your planet?

42 posted on 05/16/2002 7:00:38 PM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
FOFL. Thankyouverymuch. :)
43 posted on 05/16/2002 7:01:04 PM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Scratch shooter
You know colonialism isn't looking so bad after all just now.
44 posted on 05/16/2002 7:02:06 PM PDT by hscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Amen to that !
45 posted on 05/16/2002 7:02:18 PM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
The DemoRats pucker factor is going up. The November elections are just 5 months away, and the fools may lose the Senate.

They would deserve to lose the Senate. Additionally, I concur that they are endangering the very individuals assigned to gather information about terrorists and act appropriately. It's totally irresponsible and yes, absolutely sick and disgusting.

46 posted on 05/16/2002 7:02:52 PM PDT by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Darlin'
Bright, shiny objects? What may they be?

To be honest, I am amazed at the reaction my one, fairly innocuous post has engendered.

Nothing like free speech, huh?

47 posted on 05/16/2002 7:03:03 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Scratch shooter
Scratch: Gotta agree with that last statement...they would and WILL launch the hot shit at us when and where they can...they've clearly stated that.

Yup...we need to spark off a few of those Tactical nukes and see if they're worth a damn...we are the only nation to ever use that drastic a power...but that was 60 years ago...maybe some folks have forgotten that Fat Man was just our prototype?

48 posted on 05/16/2002 7:08:10 PM PDT by NMFXSTC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
"Well, better to be a liberal than a moron, I guess."

Y'know, you've been consistently wrong with every one of your posts on this thread. The preceeding post was the icing on the cake.

Being a moron is much better than be being a liberal. Morons are much more intellectually inclined.......

49 posted on 05/16/2002 7:13:01 PM PDT by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
"And now that I've had my daily dose of trivialities, it's time for me to bake my brownies...."

Don't forget the hemp, although I'd say you've already had more than enough....

50 posted on 05/16/2002 7:15:21 PM PDT by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
"Was there a failure of intelligence? Did the right officials not act on the intelligence in the proper way?"

These aren't legitimate questions as you tell us. These are answers in the form of questions, and considering the source, they are transparent insinuations. That is the reason for the objections you are hearing this evening.

But otherwise, it's obvious that there was a failure of intelligence. Well, duh, if there handn't been, these acts would not have occurred, would they? But to pin this failure on Dubya is to reveal total ignorance (or pretend it in this case) of how this mammoth government operates.

This is what's troubling to me: there was this Phoenix FBI memo, there was the knowledge that the Saudis, the governmen and the local yuppies there, support bin Laden, there was the knowledge that he did have his eye on the World Trade Center after one failed attempt at bringing it down, and there was the knowledge of thousands (hundreds?) of Saudis at US flight training schools. Somehow the dots were not connected. Could they have been connected? I dunno, we'll never know!

51 posted on 05/16/2002 7:15:51 PM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
That's nice. This means they are trying to cover their asses when the next, deadlier attack occurs. Will America then have the guts to shape up and do what it has to do to end the madness? I'm betting we don't. We'll just have more "diversity" commercials and Memorial servies with America hating Muslim clerics. Enjoy the ride down.
52 posted on 05/16/2002 7:17:27 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
We keep hearing the possibility of something more massive coming. Do they (the government) know something?

I think the threat of attacks has always been out there ... long, long before September 11th. The public gets restless when Tom Ridge issues terror alerts which aren't specific but most threats are not specific. Then when non-specific alerts (in hindsight) point to September 11th, the media says "Why didn't you warn us". They want it both ways.

53 posted on 05/16/2002 7:20:54 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
"The vice president attacked Democratic Party critics of the White House's
handling of pre-Sept. 11 terrorism warnings,
saying that suggestions the attacks could have been prevented were
"thoroughly irresponsible and totally unworthy of national leaders in a time of war."

I'm sure Vice President Cheney gallantly restrained himself from saying that perhaps Dastardly Daschle was promoted well above his mental capacity to perform in such a high level position as senate majority-by-one-turncoat-leader. How much more damage does Daschle seek to incur upon innocent Americans as he demonstrates his inability to understand the vital paramount importance of President Bush's war on terrorism, a war for our survival and way of life, with his incessant petty baseless lies and insulting attacks on our President's integrity and sterling honor?

54 posted on 05/16/2002 7:28:17 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Well, better to be a liberal than a moron, I guess.

A liberal is a moron.

55 posted on 05/16/2002 7:40:37 PM PDT by gcraig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
I think it’s irresponsible of the government to not run TV programs to educate the general public on the various types of threat we face as a people. No doubt, they are afraid of causing panic without an incident. Instead, they’re ensuring panic of ignorant masses at the worse possible time – when the terrorists strike.
56 posted on 05/16/2002 7:48:04 PM PDT by Barnacle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
One word: Profiling.
57 posted on 05/16/2002 8:07:26 PM PDT by nonliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
So I'm a liberal? Well, better to be a liberal than a moron, I guess.

Actually it isn't. Morons don't know any better...liberals are just plain evil.

58 posted on 05/16/2002 8:20:41 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
Vice President Dick Cheney on Thursday raised the specter of a new, devastating terror attack on the United States and said Democratic Party criticism of the White House's handling of pre-Sept. 11 terror warnings at such a time was "thoroughly irresponsible".

Well said. Now it's time to really take the gloves off...the 'New Tone' didn't work. The damned dummocrats are tone deaf! Start beating them up on their hypocrisy...Gephardt and Daschle got the same briefings the President got. I heard Senator Shelby say so this morning...Bush can't try to stay above this, now's the time to come out swinging...I'd dearly love to see him land a clean right hook on Daschle's jaw!

59 posted on 05/16/2002 8:24:55 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Nothing like free speech, huh?

Are you insinuating that the mere act of disagreeing with you somehow constitutes an infringment on your right to free speech? Your post wasn't removed, it wasn't singled out for ridicule by any moderator. It was disputed, by people with every right to free speech that you have.

If you don't like being outnumbered, you can always try DU, where opposing viewpoints are rarely tolerated.

60 posted on 05/16/2002 8:37:26 PM PDT by cgk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson