Skip to comments.
White House: Bush Was Warned of Hijack Threat-Lawmakers Seek Hijack Report Probe (AOL SCREEN)
AOL ^
| 05.16.02
| AP-via AOL FRONT PAGE
Posted on 05/16/2002 12:43:04 PM PDT by Registered

White House: Bush Was Warned of Hijack Threat Lawmakers Seek Hijack Report Probe By RON FOURNIER .c The Associated Press
WASHINGTON (May 16) - Top lawmakers on Thursday pushed for tough inquiries after the White House revealed President Bush was told a month before Sept. 11 that Osama bin Laden's terrorist network might hijack American airplanes.
''Was there a failure of intelligence?'' asked House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt, D-Mo. ''Did the right officials not act on the intelligence in the proper way? These are things we need to find out.''
Some law enforcement agencies were quietly put on alert last summer based on the information given to Bush during a regular intelligence briefing while he was on vacation at his Texas ranch the first week of August, said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.
But the president and U.S. intelligence did not know that suicide hijackers were plotting to use planes as missiles, as they did against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Fleischer said.
Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta was told of ''long-standing concerns about possible hijackings'' during his regular intelligence briefings before Sept. 11, but ''there was never a scenario put forward that was anything like the events of 9/11,'' said department spokesman Chet Lunner. ''There was no specific, credible warning to disseminate,'' Lunner said.
Fleischer said general information about the threats, which mentioned hijacking, was passed on to air carriers. He said it did not include specific and detailed warnings.
A spokesman for the trade group that represents the country's major airlines, Michael Wascom of the Air Transport Association, said: ''I am not aware of any warnings or notifications in advance of Sept. 11 concerning specific security threats to any of our airlines.''
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., called on Bush to release to congressional investigators ''the entire briefing that he was given'' by intelligence officials, and to release a recently revealed FBI memo from its Arizona office that warned of suspicious activity by Arabs at U.S. flight schools.
''We need to get the facts,'' Daschle said.
Gephardt said Congress needs to find out - in hearings open to the public - what Bush and other officials knew, when they knew it and what they did with the information. He hinted he might push for additional inquiries, and said they ''cannot be top secret.''
''Right now we have an inquiry that's going on in the intelligence committees,'' Gephardt said. ''It may or may not be sufficient to get all this done.''
Peppered with questions about the presidential heads-up, Fleischer sought to play down the development. He said there were long-standing concerns that Muslim extremists might carry out traditional hijackings, and that bin Laden had been a major worry for years.
''I don't think this should come as any surprise to anybody,'' he said of the warning given to Bush. ''But the president did not - not - receive information about the use of airplanes as missiles by suicide bombers. This was a new type of attack that was not foreseen.''
The development, the first direct link between Bush and intelligence gathered before Sept. 11 about the attacks, drew criticism from congressional investigators already looking into whether the government failed to adequately respond to evidence of potential attacks.
Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said on NBC's ''Today'': ''There was a lot of information, I believe and others believe, if it had been acted on properly we may have had a different situation on Sept. 11.''
On CNN, Shelby also questioned why the White House waited so long to acknowledge Bush's knowledge of the hijacking threat. He said of the warning: ''I think it should have been acted on, but it wasn't.''
Shelby also suggested he may demand that the White House release the top-secret CIA briefing received by Bush, and the FBI memo.
A former FAA security chief, Billie Vincent, asked why, if law-enforcement agencies had been notified of a possible hijacking threat, they didn't do more to increase security.
''With that threat escalating, why was it permissible to continue to take cutting tools on airplanes?'' Vincent asked, referring to the box-cutters the Sept. 11 hijackers used.
The revelation instantly created a politically charged atmosphere in which every White House statement about pre-Sept. 11 threats was subjected to new scrutiny. Fleischer, for example, was asked by reporters hours after the attacks whether ''there had been any warnings that the president knew of.''
He replied, ''No warnings.''
Fleischer stood by the comment Thursday, saying there indeed was no warning of suicide hijackings against American landmarks.
Bush himself said in January, ''Never did we realize that the enemy was so well organized.''
White House officials said Bush was steadfast in private that CIA Director George Tenet and FBI Director Robert Mueller have done a good job overhauling their agencies to close the gaps exposed by the Sept. 11 attacks. Their jobs are not in jeopardy, officials said.
One Bush associate quoted the president as saying ''no one knew'' that bin Laden was plotting to make the leap from traditional hijackings to the highly sophisticated suicide attacks on U.S. landmarks. ''No one passed (that type of information) to me,'' Bush was quoted as saying.
Fleischer said that starting in May 2001, there had been increased threats of terrorism strikes against U.S. targets - primarily abroad - and that security was tightened at U.S. embassies and military installations.
With the threat of hijackings, there was ''a pulling together of domestic agencies to make certain that they were aware of this information.''
At least some agency officials, including Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, said Thursday that they had received no specific information about possible terrorist hijackings of airplanes before Sept. 11.
The Associated Press reported earlier this month that FBI headquarters did not act on a memo last July from its Arizona office warning there were a large number of Arabs seeking pilot, security and airport operations training at at least one U.S. flight school and which urged a check of all flight schools to identify more possible Middle Eastern students.
A section of that classified memo also makes a passing reference to bin Laden, speculating that al-Qaida and other such groups could organize such flight training, officials said.
AP-NY-05-16-02 1232EDT
Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL. |
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; bush; bushknew; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: dawn53
bump for later reading
21
posted on
05/16/2002 1:02:18 PM PDT
by
Danette
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: Registered
Best move that I ever made was ridding my life of AOL...They made it difficult to cancel, so I started posting profanities and derogatory statements to the lefties on the boards. Got it cancelled.
23
posted on
05/16/2002 1:03:16 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: Registered
If the administration had announced on August 10th that Americans should beware of possible terrorist hijackings, by August 17th a lot of people would have been complaining that nothing had happened, it was much ado about nothing, the administration was being alarmist, the FBI sucks, etc., and by 8:00 a.m. EDT on September 11th, most people would have completely forgotten about it.
To: Registered
To: Registered
He won't. He doesn't have the balls to do it. He wants to just get along with the commies in the Senate. To be liked. I have lost a lot of respect for W. I am sadden he has not turned out as I had hoped he would.
To: Registered
Condie Rice on foxnews now, regarding this.
To: right_to_defend
I think Woods made his report AFTER the 9-11 attacks.
To: Registered
MENTAL DEMOCRAT ALERT
Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-Ga., who last month suggested that the president knew about the attacks but refused to act in order to benefit financially and politically, said she is vindicated by the new information.
"It now becomes clear why the Bush Administration has been vigorously opposing congressional hearings. The Bush Administration has been engaged in a conspiracy of silence. If committed and patriotic people had not been pushing for disclosure today's revelations would have been hidden by the White House," she said.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,52945,00.html
29
posted on
05/16/2002 1:18:43 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: right_to_defend;PsyOp
The problem is this:
FAA obtains info from about 4 possible terrorist.
FBI obtains info that terrorist may be training pilots in the US.
CIA obtains info that OBL plans to highjack airliners.
Each piece of information alone may not warrant an immediate action by those agencies, but together they would.
Unfortunately our agencies don't talk to one another. Each incident happened on a different agencies turf and each agency feels it must protect it's turf.
The break down was in the entire intelligence system, for not communicating.
To: TLBSHOW
Good Lord.
To: ET(end tyranny)
He made the report on 9/11, after the attacks.
To: Timesink
If he tries, he'll be eaten alive by the press and his RAT primary opponents. Well, one outta two ain't bad. His opponents will eat him alive.
You know the First Commandment Of Media: "Never Speak Ill Of A Democrat."
To: Registered
Ya'all hold onto your shorts! This will be settled! Big Time! Condi doing the pre-rebut now!
To: Registered
You almost have that finger picking Bush's nose. (take that buger and flick it back at the shameful media. Look who's using 9/11 for political gain now!)
Comment #36 Removed by Moderator
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: right_to_defend
James Woods: the 911 Terrorist Were on my Plane O'Reilly Factor | February 14, 2002 | James Woods
Posted on 2/14/02 9:14 PM Eastern by aculeus
On the O'Reilly Factor tonight actor James Woods revealed details of his August experience on board a westbound transcontinental flight -- including his conclusion that the men he saw were the actual terrorists involved in the 9/11 massacres.
Contrary to previous reports he did not report his experience to the FBI prior to 9/11.. He did, however, express his concerns about the four Middle Easterners to the pilot during the flight. He has since learned that the pilot then notified the FAA. Basically, he told the pilot that the men were acting like hijackers.
On 9/11 Woods called the FBI. The next day he was awakened early in the morning by a call from an FBI agent who asked to meet him. Woods offered to come to the FBI office and was told "No problem. We're in a car outside your house."
Woods made it clear in his interview -- and this greatly impressed O'Reilly -- that based on things the FBI said and his examination of published photographs, the men on his flight were all 9/11 'martyrs'. For one thing when he asked the agent if they had compared the manifest of his flight with the ID's of the terrorists the agent said they had received tens of thousands of calls since 9/11 but they were spending four hours with him ... in other words, "Draw your own conclusions, Mr. Woods".
He also said that the idea that none of the terrorists knew about each other was wrong since the men he saw died on different 911 flights.
He avoided answering some of O'Reilly's questions indicating he expected to be called as a witness in the Moussarri (?) trial.
Woods deserves a great deal of credit for his 'heads up' behavior and for his cooperation with the FBI.
To: toupsie
A congressional call for hearings on the handling of 9-11 were quietly squashed a few weeks ago. Then Clinton met with the Saudi Prince on the qiet who probably explains to Clinton how the ever loyal Saudi's warned us in August, fired their intelligence head in August and are our fast everloving friends. Clinton talks with his wife/businesspartner/senator and part-time lover plus a few select media stooges (Step-all-over-us, Carville) and others to start the buzz. Bush kicks off a $30 MM fund raiser which is unprecedented and next thing you know its open season on him. Karl Rove needs to make it clear that there was information available from various sources (FBI, foreign intel, etc) that implied some form of attack was coming but nothing specific to act on. 20/20 hindsight would make us all wiser.
39
posted on
05/16/2002 1:29:50 PM PDT
by
Ranger
To: Marine Inspector
That's what I said, he made the report AFTER the attacks. But, like with these releases of prior knowledge, hindsight is 20/20. Sure the FAA may have screwed up, but if they investigated every person that acted suspicious on flights prior to 9-11...... you have closet smokers acting funny, and who knows what else. The pilot has to live with his decision. Yes its too bad someone didn't check the flight manifest against terrorists, but again...hindsight. Now we know, but its too late....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson