Replies

OK ......you seem to know, suggest or just opine that the thread is written by a hystrical nut etc etc so trusting all that to your knowledge base versus mine I ask why (in your opinion) was the instruction given by the judge to not mention the constitution ? Or is this just a lie (again in your opinion) presented by the author of this thread ?

I pretty much don't care if the author was writing this dressed in a clown suit in a clock tower sitting on a block of ice if the judges instructions regarding the mention of the constitution are true ! That IMHO is the story here....not what good or bad tactics the defendent has used .

Stay Safe !

if the judges instructions regarding the mention of the constitution are true !

I'd like to read something besides a story from a libertarian web site before I form an opinion.

Asking jurors to interpret the Constitution is not what one is asked to do in a courtroom.

Jurors are asked to decide whether someone is guilty or not guilty of breaking THE LAW.