[Lurking Libertarian]

Is there any Little-Gators here at FR (or anywhere else) that can explain this Judges (legal & constitutional) basis for his instruction to not mention the constitution ?

You rarely hear judges say it as baldly as this one does, but this is pretty much the law everywhere (and has been since a US Supreme Court decision in around 1890). Constitutional questions are issues of law, for the judge to decide; if the judge decides the law is unconstitutional, he will throw it out, but if he decides it's not, you can't argue your constitutional claims in front of the jury.

[Squantos]

Can one not "quote" the exact text of the same Constitution that gives the Judicial Branch their authority to alledgedly conduct themselves in such a seditious manner ? I only ask as I don't understand this process .....nor do I like it.

Stay Safe !