Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sloth
Well how about an easement. You have had access to that view for X # of years. Is there not some law that grants an easement to that view, unobstructed?
284 posted on 05/14/2002 7:42:15 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: mc5cents
Well how about an easement. You have had access to that view for X # of years. Is there not some law that grants an easement to that view, unobstructed?

No.

292 posted on 05/14/2002 7:46:22 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

To: mc5cents
Let me clarify -- there is no law, but there is a tendency of the court to look on these prior-use easements favorably.

The best and most equitable solution would be to condemn the property via Eminent Domain laws and make it a public park.

303 posted on 05/14/2002 7:55:42 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

To: All
After reading every post to this thread I now have complete understanding how such Slugs like Bill and Hillary Clinton could ever get elected. Absolutly discusting. If they property owners wanted LAKE FRONT property THEY SHOULD HAVE PURCHASED IT! Trying to stop what someone else is doing on HIS LEGALLY OWNED land is nothing short of Communism. It is obvious this mindset is what the past twenty years of Suburb explosion has created. You buy a freaking lot and demand to control the whole County.
305 posted on 05/14/2002 7:56:29 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson