Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

View for sale: $30,000 New owner of a lake fences it off when homeowners wouldn't pay.
St. Petersburg Times ^ | May 14, 2002 | ROBERT FARLEY

Posted on 05/14/2002 5:05:40 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

EAST LAKE -- Many residents thought they owned the lake behind their $300,000 homes. They mowed up to the water line and chipped in yearly to treat the lake for algae blooms.

So it came as quite a shock Thursday when workers began erecting a 6-foot-high fence around the lake, obliterating their view.

For good measure, the workers painted a portion of the fence behind Alice Beehner's home bright pink and decorated it with sparkles.

"Isn't that atrocious?" Mrs. Beehner said Monday, pointing to the fence a few feet from her screened-in pool. "It's sickening!"

For 10 years the developer of their Tarpon Woods subdivision had let the taxes lapse on the 4-acre lake and a thin band of land around it.

A real estate speculator swooped in to purchase it for $1,000 at a delinquent tax sale in February. The speculator, 44-year-old Don Connolly of Valrico, now is offering to sell the land behind each of the homes for $30,000 per homeowner.

Residents ignored a letter from Connolly, trustee of the Lake Alice Land Trust that purchased the lake, offering to sell. Instead, someone took a couple of survey posts marking the property boundaries and threw them into the lake.

Connolly said that's when he decided to build the fence.

He started behind Beehner's meticulously landscaped property. The new fence separated her from two mature laurel oaks she planted shortly after moving into her home 17 years ago.


[Times photo: Jim Damaske] The fence behind the house of Alice Beehner, with dogs Beethoven and Bridgette, is pink with sparkles. Don Connolly says the color is to warn workers to stay away "because that person is very volatile and confronted us in the past."

"It's total extortion," Mrs. Beehner, 61, said Monday.

Connolly said he offered to sell the property to the homeowners as a courtesy.

"Is selling a piece of land extortion?" he said. "That doesn't make any sense to me."

He said he specializes in buying properties at tax sales. Records show he owns 50 properties in Pinellas County. Connolly said he owns 150 to 200 statewide.

"When people don't pay their taxes, this is what happens," he said. "I was willing to pay more than anyone else for this property. . . . The business we're in is unpleasant sometimes."

Connolly knows the consequences of failing to pay taxes.

Records show that in 1997 he was charged with failing to remit more than $100,000 worth of sales tax for an auto sales business he owned in Hillsborough County. Connolly blamed it on the company's accounting firm and said he reached a settlement with the state.

Because homeowners have rebuffed his offer, Connolly said, he now plans to develop two or three "executive" homes overlooking the lake. It might entail a dredge and fill project to move the lake a bit to the south, he said.

County officials said that would be difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish.

"He can't build on it unless he replaces the stormwater drainage," said Al Navaroli, a manager for the county's Development Review Services Department. "And pretty much all of it is stormwater drainage. . . . He's limited in what he can do."

But there's nothing to prevent Connolly from erecting the fence, Navaroli said, or painting it any color he chooses.

"I certainly see the man is trying to be obnoxious to his neighbors," Navaroli said. "But I don't see that he's violating any codes."

On Monday, the fence stretched across three of the 15 waterfront lots. He plans to extend it all the way around the lake.

"My intention is not to annoy anyone," he said.

As for painting the fence pink behind Mrs. Beehner's property, Connolly said, it was done to warn workers to stay away from that site "because that person is very volatile and confronted us in the past."

Connolly said he was shocked by the vitriol from some of the residents. The offer to sell small pieces of land to individual homeowners is off the table. Connolly said he is now negotiating with one homeowner interested in buying the entire 4.7-acre property.

He would not say how much he is asking. "I'm a reasonable man," Connolly said.

Mrs. Beehner warns the pink fence behind her property could be erected behind any number of homes in Pinellas.

"People need to be warned," she said. "This could happen in your back yard."

Connolly said he owns one other lake in Pinellas County.

But Navaroli said his office believes Connolly may own several properties that neighborhoods consider common areas. Navaroli said he warned the county property appraiser's office more than a year ago about the danger of taxing undevelopable lands, such as retention ponds, or selling those lands at tax sale.

"It's a pretty disgusting mess," said County Commissioner Susan Latvala. "We have to prevent this from happening again. That kind of property should not be for sale."

As for the Tarpon Woods lake, however, county officials said there may be nothing they can do to help the homeowners.

Some homeowners blame the developer, Lloyd Ferrentino for allowing the taxes to lapse. At the very least, some said, he should have notified the property owners so they could have tried to buy it. Ferrentino could not be reached Monday.

On Monday, Connolly's workers continued their fence-building, extending it behind the home of Peter Cieslinski. Cieslinski, 44, who was just released from active duty in the Navy a week ago, said he can't believe the county would allow someone to come in and take away his view of the alligators, turtles and wading birds.

"I look at it this way: There's the spirit of the law and the letter of the law," Cieslinski said. "The county is looking at this as the letter of the law. There's got to be a legal Latin term for "the law says this, but wait a minute, look at the extenuating circumstances.' "

Mrs. Beehner said neighbors plan to hire an attorney.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: property
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: You are here
Then there was nothing criminal. You admit that by your lack of follow-up substantiation. People can landscape, people can build fences. If the landscaping causes a gully that erodes the ground around a fence post -- so be it.
381 posted on 05/14/2002 8:42:48 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I read through the first 250 posts and have not seen this question, which I beleive is important: That is, Why did the homeowners only buy land to within a few feet of the lake and not into the lake? A very likely scenario is that they did not want to own a part of the lake becasue their tax assessments would be greater. If this is the case they were too cute for their own good.
382 posted on 05/14/2002 8:43:52 AM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #383 Removed by Moderator

Comment #384 Removed by Moderator

Comment #385 Removed by Moderator

To: Southack
But hey, if you DO own a lake, then by all means enjoy it. Keep others out if you must.

Thousands upon thousands of farmers and others own private lakes and ponds all over the country. They routinely keep others out.

Do deeds and titles matter? Do boundaries matter? Do taxes matter? Is private property to be protected by law?

Private property no longer exists in this country. The government has established first claim on it long ago and they are stepping up the pace with which they exert those "rights" all the time through enviromental laws, zoning laws, real estate taxes, asset forfeiture and mob rule. It didn't take long for people to catch on that they could control (and thereby own) other people's property by employing govenment to do their dirty work for them.

Many, many of them are so called conservatives. They exist on this site in great numbers, and the difference between them and liberals on this issue is nil.

PS, you seem to know this so I'm addressing your comment but not really you.

386 posted on 05/14/2002 8:48:30 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
As to the "right of redemption" it seems to be addressed in the initial tax certificate procedure. From what I read, briefly, it seems the certificate holder must keep the certificate (which generates only interest) for two years before it can be converted to a tax deed.
387 posted on 05/14/2002 8:48:38 AM PDT by Boatlawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
Uh-oh, you broke-a da code!
388 posted on 05/14/2002 8:49:34 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
A very likely scenario is that they did not want to own a part of the lake becasue their tax assessments would be greater. If this is the case they were too cute for their own good.

Great speculation. Bump

389 posted on 05/14/2002 8:49:40 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: You are here
You're right that the $210K valuation for tax assesment I threw up was ridiculous, but not so ridiculuous that I don't think it shouldn't be tried -- the lake-owner could appeal the high assesment, and the cost of that appeal would be a factor against his un-neighborliness.
390 posted on 05/14/2002 8:49:51 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

Comment #391 Removed by Moderator

Comment #392 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
I agree. Condemn the formerly-lakefront homes and sell them to more reasonable persons, who will not be predisposed to violence.

Condemnation under Eminent Domain is not a legal process based upon presdisposition to penal criminal acts. It is a legal process whereby which a government or municipal quasi-public body to acquire property for public use through a court action, in which the court decides that the use is a public use and that there are compelling reasons to allow such public use, and determines the compensation to be paid to the owner.

The condemnation of this lake would be quite easy and the public-use argument could be made rather handily in this particular case. I know you don't like it, but it is law.

393 posted on 05/14/2002 8:51:26 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
the 4-acre lake

It's a pond.

394 posted on 05/14/2002 8:53:02 AM PDT by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy; All
If the owner decided to erect a statue of himself in the lake or build an ugly boat, I doubt anyone could say anything.

Here's a fellow who's found one way to blow off steam. The link was sent to me. I don't know this fellow or live in Ga. It's a hoot. Pictures and all!

395 posted on 05/14/2002 8:53:09 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: You are here
He said he used the paint and sparkles "to warn workers to stay away from that site.

Riiiiight. And I put a lime green amc Gremlin up on blocks in the front yard to "warn people about the dog". *wink wink nudge nudge*

If you believe that one, I have a bridge over a soon-to-be-condemned lake to sell you.

396 posted on 05/14/2002 8:53:27 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
I would also look at the right of redemption.

Good point! I forgot about that.

397 posted on 05/14/2002 8:53:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

Comment #398 Removed by Moderator

To: sakic
If the homeowners take action of the illegal kind, they'd be far worse than moral slobs. They'd be breaking laws that they should be imprisoned for.

I understand your general point but I would opine that breaking laws is not always immoral and that committing an immoral act is worse than breaking a law. In this case it would be immoral and illegal. One deals with God's law and one with how man interacts with other humans.

399 posted on 05/14/2002 8:54:08 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
As I said- there are risks involved for him, but the potential payoff is worth assuming that risk.

Thanks for the update on the domain name issue- I was not aware of that development.

400 posted on 05/14/2002 8:55:27 AM PDT by ThinkingMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson