Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Outrage as US Farm Handout Agreed
BBC ^ | 5/13/02

Posted on 05/13/2002 7:05:26 PM PDT by marshmallow

President George W Bush has signed into law a bill awarding US farmers as much as $190bn in subsidies over the next decade.

The bill, which boosts spending on US farm subsidies by up to 80%, was described by Mr Bush as promoting a sector "essential to the success of the American economy".

"This bill is generous and provides a safety net for farmers," he said in an early-morning ceremony designed to make it onto newscasts in farming communities.

"It will do so without encouraging overproduction and depressing prices."

'Budget buster'

But the legislation has provoked outrage from international trade partners angry that the US again seemed to be undermining in its actions the free trade credentials it has, in its words, promoted.

And even some members of Mr Bush's own Republican party had urged the president to veto the bill, which will increase a budget deficit already swollen by defence commitments following the 11 September terror attacks.

The legislation is estimated to add $6.4bn a year to US crop and dairy spending.

"It is a budget buster," said Republican senator Don Nickles, who contested the claim that the bill would not encourage overproduction, and predicted it would eventually force farm prices down.

"I don't think that helps farmers in the long run," he said on Sunday.

'Bringing certainty'

The law, the latest in a regularly updated series of farm bills, raises crop subsidies, increases conservation spending by 80%, and restores food-stamp eligibility to legal immigrants in the US for five years.

The legislation guarantees annual payments to growers, and allows them to keep the difference between their selling price and the federally set minimum crop prices.

The bill was "huge in terms of bringing certainty to uncertain times", said Ron Warfield, Illinois Farm Bureau president.

Bad precedent

But countries including Australia, Brazil and Canada, and the European Union, have complained that the legislation undermines US free trade credentials already tarnished by the implementation of tariffs on steel imports.

Australia's prime minister, John Howard, said he would be seeking concessions.

And Donald Johnston, secretary general of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, said the subsidies would dissuade other countries from cutting their own subsidies and tariffs.

The European Union has come under considerable pressure to reform its own farm subsidy regime.

"There has been much pressure put on some of our member countries... to liberalise markets and reduce subsidies," Mr Johnston said.

"So the fact of increasing subsidies in the US I don't think is going to encourage other countries to liberalise as we have been recommending consistently."

Political considerations

He also noted that the extra spending was coming in an election year, in which the Republican party is desperate to regain control of the Senate.

The US farm states are seen as key election battlegrounds.

"Politicians have to get elected and are constantly weighing what might be right against what might be practical in terms of the current political scene," he said.

"That's what's happening obviously in the US. It's very clear that there are political decisions being made here."

His comments were echoed by Indiana senator Richard Lugar, a Republican, who warned that the bill put election year-imperatives "to try to help individual senator and house members" before sensible policy making.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 05/13/2002 7:05:26 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
He may look like President Bush, he may TALK like President Bush...he may even SMELL like President Bush, BUT HE'S REALLY A POD-PERSON FROM THE PLANET MARS!
2 posted on 05/13/2002 7:16:40 PM PDT by Frances_Marion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I have the figure breakdown of $74.4 billion for a five year period. 12.8% goes for administrative cost, 24.2% goes for food stamps, 11.2% goes for school lunch program, 4.7% goes to WIC, and 21.5% actually goes to farmers, which is about $16 billion. Still a lot of money, but a more truthful figure.
3 posted on 05/13/2002 7:18:00 PM PDT by Iowaagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iowaagman
So why weren't the farmers pushing for the whole bill to be scrapped?
4 posted on 05/13/2002 7:31:45 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Screw the free market there are votes to buy with taxpayer money.
5 posted on 05/13/2002 7:43:47 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frances_Marion
I get that feeling too I'm tempted to become a tinfoiler Bush flipped leftward right after the "pretzel incindent".
6 posted on 05/13/2002 7:44:47 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
What is the standard Freeper defense for this monstrosity of socialism?
7 posted on 05/13/2002 7:48:33 PM PDT by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
another brilliant move from the Bush "Polit Bureau"

Kruschev would be pleased,

DITCH THE DUMBASS

8 posted on 05/13/2002 7:51:22 PM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GuillermoX
I think the standard responce to the Republican socialist agenda is "This is a time of war"

This is pathetic,

9 posted on 05/13/2002 7:53:15 PM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ContentiousObjector
It would have been nice if, when first presented with the bill, Bush had turned to his advisors and asked them "Isn't this the kind of thing we came here to not do?"

Hey, a guy can dream.

10 posted on 05/13/2002 7:55:24 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Carl Rove the GOP Dick Morris triangulates again
11 posted on 05/13/2002 8:04:25 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
If I was Bush I would give these stupid farmers a one way ticket to France,
12 posted on 05/13/2002 8:05:53 PM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GuillermoX
I think even the Bush bots are pissed now.
13 posted on 05/13/2002 8:08:10 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iowaagman
24.2% goes for food stamps

You're probably right. I didn't take into consideration that Dubya just poured an enormous amount of money into welfare via food stamps.

14 posted on 05/13/2002 8:10:15 PM PDT by tututango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: uncbob
"Carl Rove the GOP Dick Morris triangulates again."

Triangulates?

It seems like a straight line between Dubya and the Democrats these days.

16 posted on 05/13/2002 8:11:43 PM PDT by CoolGuyVic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Well, yes and no. The bushbots that are farm owners probably aren't too P.O.ed just yet.

LOL
17 posted on 05/13/2002 8:12:32 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Iowaagman
So did Bush say who will pay for this?
18 posted on 05/13/2002 8:13:56 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scratch shooter
I do not know enough about the Fedgov's finances I don't imagine it can be too far away from bankruptcy.
19 posted on 05/13/2002 8:15:57 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
The only reason the Canadians are mad is that because of their own government subsidies they were able to dump grain on our market and now they won't be able to anymore. Ha Ha

It is the same way with Mexican farmers, their government pays for their energy needs, tells them what to plant and pays them a set amount per acre and then they dump on our market.

This is all about global politics rather than the health and wealth of America. When foreign governments control our food they will control us too.

20 posted on 05/13/2002 8:16:46 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson