He seems to think that by SAYING he cares about the FOLKS we're goinna BELIEVE he cares. HAH! Not me. I can smell insincerity, and ego-drive a thousand miles away, and his stench is particularly bad. Here's a guy who'd stop on a dime to look at his mug on a mirror, causing a major traffic accident, and be unaware of anything but himself. YUKKKK!
----->Chip
Also, I think that Drudge should have been offended that O'Reilly came on his show and lied to him and his audience. The news that the execs are paying for this show to be a success and that many local talents are being fired or bumped will create animosity towards O'Reilly as well.
That was a cheap shot at PH. The man puts out more 'interesting' news in a 15-minute broadcast than RL puts out in 15-hour week.
I agree with you on BO. Can't watch him.
O'Reilly, the sage of Levittown, never had any of these qualities.
Proof? Next time you watch an interview, whether with friend or foe, keep score with a pen and a piece of paper. Every time BOR asks a question, draw a circle (be quick) and, if he interrupts BEFORE the guest can finish his answer, draw a line (backslash) through the same circle. By "interrupt," I mean, "abruptly speak over," in such a fashion that, if your teenage kid did that to you, you'd smack him. At the end of the interview, you will find very few clean circles.
BOR can be entertaining and I have no real problem with his ego. It is just that he is not very good.
But not always. Sean Hannity has done well in both media. O'Reilly will do OK, but his big mistake is going head to head with Rush. No way are Rush's listeners going to switch to Bill.
BTW I think you're off base with the criticism. So he's got a big ego and wears nice suits and talks about the ordinary folks. So does Rush. So what? He does a great job at what he does. Just because he's successful now does not mean he can't relate to the "ordinary folks".
Finally as far as his remarks on Imus, I haven't heard the cut but it sounds to me like he trying to make light of it. And I doubt anyone who doesn't read Drudge report ever heard of it.
he is conservative far more often than liberal, and his show reaches lots of people. Lots of people who could be wooed to our point of view with a little exposure to it.
O'reilly is certainly not perfect, but he is still a big asset to conservatism.
The majority of his work is based on his assertion being the best and only correct one. Boring self righteous liberal nonsense.
He lost me permanently when he came out for reparations.
The man is an egotistical loon. He will not last 6 months on radio. He does not have the talent that lies in RL's cigar ashes. He is not as good as Sean Hannity.
Thin skinned and boring, what a compelling combination.
Also very early on, there were many small stations that considered dumping Rush before he hit his stride. He worked the phones to keep them on. In some cases virtually begging and pleading not to have the show yanked. Any loss would have hurt terribly. Some of these smaller stations were terribly miffed when Rush's popularity began to zoom and he dumped them for larger signals.
I know, marketplace dynamics, but there is something also to be said about loyality, especially when some of those smaller stations by hanging in there with hime like was the differnece between Rush being where he is today or just another footnote like Cuomo in talk radio. Those 30 or so small stations could have sank his boat if they had given up and pulled the plug early on.
I knew you could.
See also:
O'Reilly's tragic flaw: Geoff Metcalf follows latest radio dust-up with DrudgeHIS post was earlier, but YOURS got more replies!
Posted by JohnHuang2
On May 13 8:43 AM with 13 comments
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Monday, May 13, 2002 | Geoff Metcalf
FYI, the FR search engine finds different results for:
O'Reilly
and
O'Reilly's