Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are You Liberal Or Conservative?
ToogoodReports ^ | May 12, 2002 | Ben Cerruti

Posted on 05/10/2002 8:26:22 AM PDT by Starmaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2002 8:26:22 AM PDT by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
are you liberal or conservative?

I am somewhere to the right of Barry Goldwater, slightly to the left of Attila the Hun.

2 posted on 05/10/2002 8:49:37 AM PDT by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Best definition ever: liberals base their facts on emotions, conservatives basic their emotions on facts.
3 posted on 05/10/2002 8:52:29 AM PDT by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Wanna Be a Liberal? Raise your right hand and repeat after me:

"The Rules don't apply to me."

Congratulations. You are now a Liberal.

4 posted on 05/10/2002 9:00:36 AM PDT by Carlucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
These beliefs included emphasizing faith and tradition ahead of freedom of thought and speech, as well as, supporting the total interest of society over those of its individual members. Sounds to a degree like present day liberalism doesn´t it?

Well no, it doesn't. Faith and tradition are leftwing values? Looking at the WOD through the lens of supporting societal interests over rights of the individual is also not a liberal trait. I don't know what this author is smoking, but I'm having none of it.
Oh, well, at least Starmaker didn't post the article in all bold text. That was refreshing.

5 posted on 05/10/2002 9:07:35 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Please note that these definitions do not include side issues such as abortion, gun control, immigration, campaign reform etc. Conservatives and liberals may have similar positions without compromising their respective ideal ideology.

*** Translation - these labels don't mean anything ***

6 posted on 05/10/2002 9:12:26 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
"...it is the responsibility for the individuals within each family to do as much as they can for themselves before asking for assistance..."

I really love that sentence.It drives my Lib. Associates Crazy,when I say things like that.I've been called Uncompassionate, Rude, Harsh,Nazi,Uncaring,Filthy Republican-----all of which are completely laughable.I think you have to attempt to try and get a job.Noone should be able to receive benefits (those are partly MY tax dollars you know)w/out trying,and a hearty attempt at that,and more than once.Hell,in the real world Nothing is Free.You have to EARN IT!

7 posted on 05/10/2002 9:14:19 AM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
you socialist, you!!
8 posted on 05/10/2002 9:16:35 AM PDT by aardvark1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Labels change on a regional basis. People who call themselves "conservative" in New York would typically be called "moderate" anyplace else, etc.

I am philosophically a classical liberal, although a social conservative when it comes to family issues (which are not the province of government anyway). This places me in the far right of the American political spectrum, although I still have strong disagreements with most American "conservatives" on many social and economic issues.

9 posted on 05/10/2002 9:19:57 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pagey
... in the real world Nothing is Free. You have to EARN IT!

That is so uncompassionate saying we have to eat our bread by the sweat of our brow! After all, we know that the government can just print more money to give to the lazy--I mean misfortunate.

10 posted on 05/10/2002 9:31:36 AM PDT by 2nd_Amendment_Defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe; Askel5; ppaul; ex-snook; kidd; Snuffington; Inspector Harry Callahan; JohnHuang2...

Conservatism — from the foregoing we find that this term conveys the following:

  1. A free market and the personal acquisition of property by individuals.
  2. Individual freedoms and property rights are representative of attendant moral, religious, political, and civil rights.
  3. In accordance with the Constitution, the federal government is limited to acting in those areas wherein the states themselves do not have that ability, in inter-state matters and in foreign relations.
  4. There is great importance placed on separation of powers, judicial review, and states' rights as opposed to federal power.

Using the above definition, is President Bush a conservative?


A free market and the personal acquisition of property by individuals:
Steel tariffs?

Individual freedoms and property rights are representative of attendant moral, religious, political, and civil rights:
Patriot Act?

In accordance with the Constitution, the federal government is limited to acting in those areas wherein the states themselves do not have that ability, in inter-state matters and in foreign relations:
$26.5 billion increase in education spending?

There is great importance placed on separation of powers, judicial review, and states' rights as opposed to federal power:
Military tribunals?

Believing something and putting it into practice are two different things.
11 posted on 05/10/2002 9:47:15 AM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
In Order To Be a Liberal

You have to believe the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of funding.

You have to believe that the same public school teacher who can't teach 4th graders how to read, is qualified to teach those same kids about sex.

You have to believe that trial lawyers are selfless heroes and doctors are overpaid.

You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than nuclear weapons in the hands of Chinese communists.

You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical, documented changes in the brilliance of the sun, and more affected by yuppies driving SUVs.

You have to believe that gender roles are artificial but being gay is natural.

You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.

You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but pasty, revisionist activists who've never been outside Seattle do.

You have to believe that self esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.

You have to believe there was no art before federal funding.

You have to believe there was no housing before HUD.

You have to believe the military, not corrupt politicians, start wars.

You have to believe the free market that gives us 500+ channels, can't deliver the quality that PBS does.

You have to believe that without a federal Department of Energy, there would be no gasoline or electricity.

You have to believe the NRA is bad, because they stand up for all of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good, because they stand up for a few parts of the Constitution.

You have to believe that taxes are too low but ATM fees are too high.

You have to believe that Harriet Tubman, Cesar Chavez, and Gloria Steinem are more important to American history than George Washington, General Robert E. Lee or Thomas A. Edison.

You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides aren't.

You have to believe second-hand smoke is more dangerous than anthrax or sarin gas.

You have to believe Rosie O'Donnell is brilliant.

You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in charge.

12 posted on 05/10/2002 9:51:00 AM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Tuco-bad
Your to the left of Atilla the Hun damn we have RINOS on FR. LOL :).
14 posted on 05/10/2002 10:20:22 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
You have just defined yourself as a moderate liberal.
15 posted on 05/10/2002 10:22:25 AM PDT by CyberSpartacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
What about those who believe government should impose morality via legislation? For instance, where does a person that wants to give gays special rights fit? What about a person that wants to imprison gays? Can the imprisonment of gays be reconciled with a notion of the maximum personal liberties, and minimum government intrusion?
16 posted on 05/10/2002 10:24:47 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Faith and tradition are leftwing values? Looking at the WOD through the lens of supporting societal interests over rights of the individual is also not a liberal trait.

Liberals have faith in government, and seek to strengthen it.

There is also a group of people who identify themselves as conservatives, but seek to use the force of government to institute morality. Is this consistent with a definition where a conservative seeks to have the minimum government intervention? Or do these people fit somewhere outside the conservative spectrum? Or is the definition wrong?

Moreover, there are some people who seek to relegate all these issues to the individual states, and let each state decide for itself. What are these people called? Is there a difference between a federal action and THE SAME action at the state level?

17 posted on 05/10/2002 10:32:28 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Individual freedoms and property rights are representative of attendant moral, religious, political, and civil rights.

What in the hell are moral, religious and political rights? The author just invented a concept as to negate natural rights. Pretty typical of those who call themselves "liberals" amd "conservatives".

18 posted on 05/10/2002 10:36:36 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"A conservative believes in the least government possible."

Amen.

19 posted on 05/10/2002 10:42:05 AM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Carlucci
Wanna Be a Liberal? Raise your right hand and repeat after me:
"The Rules don't apply to me."
Congratulations. You are now a Liberal.

Well, that may or may not have been a decent 1960's definition, but it won't fly today.

I am always distressed by how many conservatives define conservatism as some sort of sheeple-like obedience to the "law" or the "rules". Conservatism is about standing on a set of PRINCIPALS. Laws and rules (especially today) often run counter to conservative principals.

I don't know about anyone else, but I have not been in a coma for the last 3 decades. The precious rules that you define conservatism as a blind obedience to are no longer, for the most part, moral or constitutional. They are made by anti-freedom, anti-American, counter-culture interests.

So yes, as a conservative, I can proudly say that sometimes, the rules don't apply to me either.

When does conservatism stop being defind as blind obedience in your eyes?

20 posted on 05/10/2002 10:50:38 AM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson