The first factor is the three-judge panel that is randomly selected to hear each appeal. But -- important but -- "liberal" and "conservative" lose a good bit of their meaning when applied to judges. For instance, on the Supreme Court it is the "liberals" who say that where the First Amendment says, "Congress shall make no law," it means Congress shall make no law. It is the "conservatives" who often take the opposite approach.
It is far, far better to win in the Ninth Circuit and have the L.A. Slimes and the Washington Pest take the case up, than to lose there and have to take it up ourselves. The reason is that the Supreme Court only takes 0.5% (a half a percent) of the cases offered to it for review. The usual fate of cases presented is to leave the lower court decision standing, without comment.
I will seek a way to file an amicus curia brief in the Supreme Court on behalf of FreeRepublic's position. There will be many interested parties who will support its viewpoint. (When that comes around, it will be either my 18th or 19th brief in that court. None have been more honorable than this one will be.)
Congressman Billybob
Click here to fight Campaign Finance "Reform" - CFR
Click here for latest: "President John Edwards -- Think About It."