[BlackElk]

Consider the possibility that you are often wrong but never uncertain and that any Christian who rejects tradition and the guide of the papacy must necessarily believe that the Bible speaks for itself and does not need yet more in the way of folks who are absolutely sure that their individual interpretation (there is no other word that will do) is the Word of God. As a matter of fact, isn't a hissy fit sort of a work? Just asking! [and only because of the unnecessary attack on the Roman Catholic Church as "decaying" when you know that RCC will be here to the end of the world, as guaranteed.)

[exmarine]

Consider the possibility that you are often wrong but never uncertain and that any Christian who rejects tradition and the guide of the papacy must necessarily believe that the Bible speaks for itself and does not need yet more in the way of folks who are absolutely sure that their individual interpretation (there is no other word that will do) is the Word of God. As a matter of fact, isn't a hissy fit sort of a work? Just asking! [and only because of the unnecessary attack on the Roman Catholic Church as "decaying" when you know that RCC will be here to the end of the world, as guaranteed.)

Anyone who believes the dribble in this thread is no believer in Jesus Christ. Unless you have another bible or evidence that presents a truth other than what the bible teaches about the identity of Jesus Christ or the way to salvation, then the bible stands. There is no possible way anyone with an objective brain can interpret "Son of God" to be "nephew" or "adopted son". It is not a matter if interpretation when you print "satire" like this - it's a matter of DISRESPECT and BLASPHEMY. Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life and no one comes to the Father but by me." [jn 14:6] Interpret that for me. Also, there is only ONE correct interpretation of the bible - the one that the writer intended. You can call an apple an orange all day long but any discerning person will see the truth.