Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists' deaths are under the microscope
The Globe and Mail ^ | Saturday, May 4, 2002 | ALANNA MITCHELL

Posted on 05/04/2002 10:35:59 PM PDT by Nachum

It's a tale only the best conspiracy theorist could dream up.

Eleven microbiologists mysteriously dead over the span of just five months. Some of them world leaders in developing weapons-grade biological plagues. Others the best in figuring out how to stop millions from dying because of biological weapons. Still others, experts in the theory of bioterrorism.

Throw in a few Russian defectors, a few nervy U.S. biotech companies, a deranged assassin or two, a bit of Elvis, a couple of Satanists, a subtle hint of espionage, a big whack of imagination, and the plot is complete, if a bit reminiscent of James Bond.

The first three died in the space of just over a week in November. Benito Que, 52, was an expert in infectious diseases and cellular biology at the Miami Medical School. Police originally suspected that he had been beaten on Nov. 12 in a carjacking in the medical school's parking lot. Strangely enough, though, his body showed no signs of a beating. Doctors then began to suspect a stroke.

Just four days after Dr. Que fell unconscious came the mysterious disappearance of Don Wiley, 57, one of the foremost microbiologists in the United States. Dr. Wiley, of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Harvard University, was an expert on how the immune system responds to viral attacks such as the classic doomsday plagues of HIV, ebola and influenza.

He had just bought tickets to take his son to Graceland the following day. Police found his rental car on a bridge outside Memphis, Tenn. His body was later found in the Mississippi River. Forensic experts said he may have had a dizzy spell and have fallen off the bridge.

Just five days after that, the world-class microbiologist and high-profile Russian defector Valdimir Pasechnik, 64, fell dead. The pathologist who did the autopsy, and who also happened to be associated with Britain's spy agency, concluded he died of a stroke.

Dr. Pasechnik, who defected to the United Kingdom in 1989, played a huge role in Russian biowarfare and helped to figure out how to modify cruise missiles to deliver the agents of mass biological destruction.

The next two deaths came four days apart in December. Robert Schwartz, 57, was stabbed and slashed with what police believe was a sword in his farmhouse in Leesberg, Va. His daughter, who identifies herself as a pagan high priestess, and several of her fellow pagans have been charged.

Dr. Schwartz was an expert in DNA sequencing and pathogenic micro-organisms, who worked at the Center for Innovative Technology in Herndon, Va.

Four days later, Nguyen Van Set, 44, died at work in Geelong, Australia, in a laboratory accident. He entered an airlocked storage lab and died from exposure to nitrogen. Other scientists at the animal diseases facility of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization had just come to fame for discovering a virulent strain of mousepox, which could be modified to affect smallpox.

Then in February, the Russian microbiologist Victor Korshunov, 56, an expert in intestinal bacteria of children around the world, was bashed over the head near his home in Moscow. Five days later the British microbiologist Ian Langford, 40, was found dead in his home near Norwich, England, naked from the waist down and wedged under a chair. He was an expert in environmental risks and disease.

Two weeks later, two prominent microbiologists died in San Francisco. Tanya Holzmayer, 46, a Russian who moved to the U.S. in 1989, focused on the part of the human molecular structure that could be affected best by medicine.

She was killed by fellow microbiologist Guyang (Matthew) Huang, 38, who shot her seven times when she opened the door to a pizza delivery. Then he shot himself.

The final two deaths came one day after the other in March. David Wynn-Williams, 55, a respected astrobiologist with the British Antarctic Survey, who studied the habits of microbes that might survive in outer space, died in a freak road accident near his home in Cambridge, England. He was hit by a car while he was jogging.

The following day, Steven Mostow, 63, known as Dr. Flu for his expertise in treating influenza, and a noted expert in bioterrorism, died when the airplane he was piloting crashed near Denver.

So what does any of it mean?

"Statistically, what are the chances?" wondered a prominent North American microbiologist reached last night at an international meeting of infectious-disease specialists in Chicago.

Janet Shoemaker, director of public and scientific affairs of the American Society for Microbiology in Washington, D.C., pointed out yesterday that there are about 20,000 academic researchers in microbiology in the U.S. Still, not all of these are of the elevated calibre of those recently deceased.

She had a chilling, final thought. When microbiologists die in a lab, there's a way of taking note of the deaths and adding them up. When they die in freakish accidents outside the lab, nobody keeps track.

Suspicious deaths

The sudden and suspicious deaths of 11 of the world's leading microbiologists.

Who they were:

1. Nov. 12, 2001:

Benito Que was said to have been beaten in a Miami parking lot and died later.

2. Nov. 16, 2001:

Don C. Wiley went missing. Was found Dec. 20. Investigators said he got dizzy on a Memphis bridge and fell to his death in a river.

3. Nov. 21, 2001:

Vladimir Pasechnik, former high-level Russian microbiologist who defected in 1989 to the U.K. apparently died from a stroke.

4. Dec. 10, 2001:

Robert M. Schwartz was stabbed to death in Leesberg, Va. Three Satanists have been arrested.

5. Dec. 14, 2001:

Nguyen Van Set died in an airlock filled with nitrogen in his lab in Geelong, Australia.

6. Feb. 9, 2002:

Victor Korshunov had his head bashed in near his home in Moscow.

7. Feb. 14, 2002:

Ian Langford was found partially naked and wedged under a chair in Norwich, England.

8. 9. Feb. 28, 2002:

San Francisco resident Tanya Holzmayer was killed by a microbiologist colleague, Guyang Huang, who shot her as she took delivery of a pizza and then apparently shot himself.

10. March 24, 2002:

David Wynn-Williams died in a road accident near his home in Cambridge, England.

11. March 25, 2002:

Steven Mostow of the Colorado Health Sciences Centre, killed in a plane he was flying near Denver.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; scientistsdeaths
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: MarMema
Thanks for posting the information from Geelong. Yes, very alarming possibilities. At the moment, Australia is considering the most draconian anti-terrorist laws you could possibly see, and one wonders why. Either it is the usual government reaction of "I want more power", or they are gearing up for some type of genuine threat.
101 posted on 05/05/2002 5:29:08 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
"Sounds like something out of The Avengers." (Grin! That's probably why I remembered it.) Thanks for putting the article.
102 posted on 05/05/2002 5:30:59 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil;cicero's son;Mitchell;Nogbad;Thud;EternalHope;DarkWing
At the moment, Australia is considering the most draconian anti-terrorist laws you could possibly see, and one wonders why.

A huge added complication to the job of taking out Saddam is that his sleepers could strike anywhere. For example, suppose we put in the appropriate civil defense infrastructure to contain the threat in the most obvious, high-value, high vulnerability targets, e.g. high-tech aerosol detectors in the NYC and DC subways, millions of doses of anthrax vaccine, and distribution channels for treating millions of people in the space of 24 hours. Even if we can do that, Saddam could always threaten massive casualties in less-defended cities of the US or of our allies. And, believe me, if his back's against the wall, he'll do anything that stands a chance of working. This is another reason why I think a realistic timescale for removing Saddam is years, not months.

103 posted on 05/05/2002 6:36:39 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: gg188
One thing is more important to struggle and survival than might or any other factor: WILL. We have to have the will to do what must be done. We had the will against the Nazis, and against imperial Japan. We don't have that will in this conflict. We have to believe that what we have is worth preserving.

Well said. Concealing the true horror saps our ability to become emotionally involved, to develop the sense that it's us, real people, they wish to destroy...

104 posted on 05/05/2002 6:37:05 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
lebump
105 posted on 05/05/2002 6:39:58 PM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
LOL!
106 posted on 05/05/2002 6:48:04 PM PDT by vikingchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
bump
107 posted on 05/05/2002 7:04:20 PM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
The reference is to Journal of Virology.

Jackson RJ, Ramsay AJ, Christensen CD, Beaton S, Hall DF, Ramshaw IA.

Expression of mouse interleukin-4 by a recombinant ectromelia virus suppresses cytolytic lymphocyte responses and overcomes genetic resistance to mousepox.

J Virol. 2001 Feb;75(3):1205-10.

Pest Animal Control Cooperative Research Centre, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra, Australia. R.Jackson@cse.csiro.au

Genetic resistance to clinical mousepox (ectromelia virus) varies among inbred laboratory mice and is characterized by an effective natural killer (NK) response and the early onset of a strong CD8(+) cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response in resistant mice. We have investigated the influence of virus-expressed mouse interleukin-4 (IL-4) on the cell-mediated response during infection. It was observed that expression of IL-4 by a thymidine kinase-positive ectromelia virus suppressed cytolytic responses of NK and CTL and the expression of gamma interferon by the latter. Genetically resistant mice infected with the IL-4-expressing virus developed symptoms of acute mousepox accompanied by high mortality, similar to the disease seen when genetically sensitive mice are infected with the virulent Moscow strain. Strikingly, infection of recently immunized genetically resistant mice with the virus expressing IL-4 also resulted in significant mortality due to fulminant mousepox. These data therefore suggest that virus-encoded IL-4 not only suppresses primary antiviral cell-mediated immune responses but also can inhibit the expression of immune memory responses.

It is not such a big deal.

What you suggest is different than the focus of the article that began this thread. You are suggesting a specific foul play for a specific reason. I find that unlikely, but it is a very different idea than this vapor-like grand conspiracy of who is killing the great microbiologists of the world (to paraphrase the title of an old book and movie).

What you are saying is rational and coherent. I seriosly doubt, but it is in a very different league than the other idea.

108 posted on 05/05/2002 8:30:23 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
True, I latched onto that one death because I found it frighening. The guy was in charge of keeping the biological samples at the largest virus housing facility in the world. He was apparently alone after hours and then found dead from what I know to be an easily staged accident. Found dead in the very storage place where the samples were kept.
109 posted on 05/05/2002 8:46:56 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
Thanks for the update
Somebody come on last week and posted one of Black Jade's threads using a new alias which was deleted shortly after I read it.
110 posted on 05/05/2002 9:03:01 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: no one in particular
Ignorance is bliss.

Some people are very happy...

111 posted on 05/05/2002 9:13:44 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Ultimately, the only defense against any WMD is the certainty of retaliation, at a scale of destructiveness greater than that of the original attack.
112 posted on 05/05/2002 10:37:40 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell
Ultimately, the only defense against any WMD is the certainty of retaliation, at a scale of destructiveness greater than that of the original attack.

Again, the problem with that in this case is that Saddam can only die once. Since we would be targeting him for destruction in any case, if he had perpetrated 9/11 without a MAD backup, adding the MAD element is pure gravy for him, a no-lose proposition. Indeed, my guess is that we will engineer a way for him to leave power without actually killing him, because the risk of retaliation is too great. Having doomsday weapons at your disposal is useful -- it really works. That's why we and several other countries have spent trillions of dollars on WMD deterrents over the past fifty years.

113 posted on 05/05/2002 11:23:09 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
There's nothing to argue with there. I never said that the threat of retaliation was a perfect defense or that it would always work. But it's the only general defense with a chance of working. (As has been pointed out many times, you can't protect everything. And even if you did protect everything with, say, a 95% success rate, it would still take only around 20 tries before we would suffer a disastrous attack.)
114 posted on 05/05/2002 11:30:19 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy;null and void
Tallhappy, the poster Null and Void is a member of MENSA. Just FYI, trying to be helpful here. :)Nully, I hope you don't mind my telling that.
115 posted on 05/06/2002 7:53:36 AM PDT by Letitring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Thanks for the warning.

I have the Waco kids pics.

That is nothing to me. Just a hand.

116 posted on 05/06/2002 6:18:09 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
"my guess is that we will engineer a way for him to leave power without actually killing him" About 2 years ago, there was an article in "Foreign Affairs", suggesting that putting Saddam into a position where he has to either resist or commit suicide is not a good stragegy. Perhaps someone is thinking beyond it. But is he?
117 posted on 05/06/2002 10:39:15 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell
"a 95% success rate, it would still take only around 20 tries before we would suffer a disastrous attack ... " Yes, that is the essence of those types of threats. It reminds me of the message which the IRA sent Mrs Thatcher, after a failed assassination attempt: "We missed - you were lucky. But we only have to be lucky once. You have to be lucky always."
118 posted on 05/06/2002 10:44:04 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
My guess would be that Team Bush identified the essential dynamics of the situation last September and everything they are now doing is coordinated towards the end of isolating Saddam and then easing him out, minimizing the risk to our civilian population. I think the strategy with Arafat -- the carefully modulated phsase down -- is a prototype for that operation.
119 posted on 05/06/2002 10:45:50 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
The problem being that in years, he'll have nukes.

And ballistic missiles capable of delivering them.

I'm beginning to think that millions of deaths are inevitable. We are slouching toward the crisis of our age, and there is no diplomacy that can stop it.

120 posted on 05/06/2002 10:46:02 PM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson