Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema
Thanks for posting the information from Geelong. Yes, very alarming possibilities. At the moment, Australia is considering the most draconian anti-terrorist laws you could possibly see, and one wonders why. Either it is the usual government reaction of "I want more power", or they are gearing up for some type of genuine threat.
101 posted on 05/05/2002 5:29:08 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: BlackVeil;cicero's son;Mitchell;Nogbad;Thud;EternalHope;DarkWing
At the moment, Australia is considering the most draconian anti-terrorist laws you could possibly see, and one wonders why.

A huge added complication to the job of taking out Saddam is that his sleepers could strike anywhere. For example, suppose we put in the appropriate civil defense infrastructure to contain the threat in the most obvious, high-value, high vulnerability targets, e.g. high-tech aerosol detectors in the NYC and DC subways, millions of doses of anthrax vaccine, and distribution channels for treating millions of people in the space of 24 hours. Even if we can do that, Saddam could always threaten massive casualties in less-defended cities of the US or of our allies. And, believe me, if his back's against the wall, he'll do anything that stands a chance of working. This is another reason why I think a realistic timescale for removing Saddam is years, not months.

103 posted on 05/05/2002 6:36:39 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson