Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Owns the Holy Land
World Net Daily ^ | 5-1-02 | Hal Lindsey

Posted on 05/01/2002 5:14:43 PM PDT by hope

The whole world is being drawn into the current conflict over the Holy Land. The Bible predicted that just such a situation would develop in the "Last Days." As predicted, two ancient peoples are at the center of the controversy, the Arabs and the Israelites. The Arabs call the land Palestine. The Israelites call it by its ancient name, Israel. There are unique and extraordinary circumstances in the history of these people, which cause much misunderstanding by most people today.

First, they both originated from the same forefather – Abraham – 4,000 years ago. The Israelites, commonly called "Jews" today, descended from Abraham through Isaac and Jacob. The Arabs descended from Abraham through Ishmael and Esau.

Second, God chose Abraham's line through Isaac and Jacob to be the recipients of several covenants that established them as his special representatives on earth. Basically they were chosen for the following purposes:

In order to accomplish these purposes, God made unconditional promises to them that involved making them a unique nation with an everlasting title deed to specifically defined land.

Historically, the descendents of Ishmael and Esau have felt that somehow they were cheated. This created an enmity that has smoldered and burst into flames at various times in history.

God forewarned the Israelites through Moses that their nation would twice be destroyed for failing to obey Him. The second destruction would be far more severe than the first – the people would be scattered throughout every nation under heaven. They would be persecuted and have no assurance of life. This was literally fulfilled, beginning with the Roman destruction of Israel and Jerusalem in A.D. 70 (Deuteronomy 28:64-68 and Luke 21:20-24).

This dispersion began to draw to a close in May of 1948 when, against all odds, Israel was reborn as a nation.

This has created unique problems for the world. Never before has a people been scattered for almost 2,000 years, remained virtually a nation in exile, returned to claim their ancient homeland and then been reborn as a nation. The Arabs and all Muslims say Israel has no right to this land because they took it for Allah by Jihad, or holy war, centuries ago. According to their belief, Mohammed ascended to heaven from Jerusalem. Therefore, it is considered their third holiest place.

The secular world, especially Europe, sees the state of Israel as a nuisance that hinders the free flow of oil from the Arab nations. So they mostly side with the Arabs for economic reasons.

There are two different attitudes toward Israel's right to statehood in the Holy Land among Christians. One group interprets Bible prophecy in an allegorical sense and says that Israel forfeited its covenant rights when it rejected Jesus as Messiah. A few in this group say that Israel in any event can never be given the land by God until they repent and believe in the true Messiah.

Then there are those Christians (and I am one of them) who simply take at face value what God has promised the Israelites. The prophecies of Ezekiel chapters 36 through 39 are one example. They all focus on the present Arab-Israeli conflict, which closely precedes the Messiah's coming to set up God's promised kingdom to Abraham's believing descendents.

First, God warns all of the nations that surround Israel, "Thus says the Lord God, 'Surely in the fire of My jealousy I have spoken against the rest of the nations, and against all Edom, who appropriated My land for themselves as a possession with wholehearted joy and with scorn of soul, to drive it out for a prey.'" (Ezek. 36: 5) "Edom" refers to the Arabs descended from Esau. The surrounding nations are all Muslim today.

Note that God says, "My Land." The Muslims don't own it, neither do the Jews – God owns it. He gives it to whom He chooses and not on the basis of human merit.

Second, God declares to whom and why He is going to give the Holy Land, "Therefore, say to the house of Israel, 'Thus says the Lord God, 'It is not for your sake, O house of Israel, that I am about to act, but for My holy name, which you have profaned among the nations where you went. And I will vindicate the holiness of My great name which has been profaned among the nations, which you have profaned in their midst. Then the nations will know that I am the Lord …" And then, "For I will take you from the nations, gather you from all the lands, and bring you into your own land. Then I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you will be clean … I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you. …" (Ezek. 36:22-26)

The Bible clearly shows that God is going to give "His Land" to Israel. Not because they deserve it, but because His great name is at stake – God cannot break a promise. It is after this that God will bring the Jews to repentance and give them a new heart. He will accomplish this through delivering them from a coming war that will almost destroy the world.

God disciplines His own for disobedience, but He never disowns them. We who are Christians can thank God for that, or we would have all been disowned. God has thrown his gauntlet into the arena with His promises to Israel. And Hell will freeze over before He fails to fulfill them, though the whole world tries to prevent it.


For a limited time, new Whistleblower subscribers will receive – FREE – the celebrated book, "Battleground: Fact and Fantasy in Palestine." This classic primer on the Mideast (which normally sells for $19.99 at WorldNetDaily's online store) is considered one of the best-written and most accurate histories of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Subscribe to Whistleblower now and receive 12 monthly issues, including June's special Mideast issue and your FREE copy of "Battleground" (while supplies last).


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Phil V.
"Freedom of Religion" crack. Perhaps, the "mutual respect" crack was more appropriate: freedom of religion regulates what happens between a person and the gevernment. That is what made me confused.

All is settled now.

61 posted on 05/02/2002 8:06:21 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
Phil, I think that TQ's "problem" is related to a quantum paradox WRT to dead cats.

I did not have a problem: Phil did (see #61).

I guess, you wanted to shine and give us a complete account of what you had heard about quantum mechanics. Go ahead, then; I'll go out for a walk...

62 posted on 05/02/2002 8:14:33 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Yes, that's right. It involves choosing sides. Fence riders will be swept away with the chaffe. Now *that* is dicey.

Chariots Up!

63 posted on 05/02/2002 8:21:39 AM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Big_Time_Clymer's_Anonymous
If you could choose would you prefer "particle" over "wave"?

I would prefer "wave" because it is more general: I can imagine a particle as a particular wave or wave packet.

Or do you find functionality in duality? There is some convenience. But I think most people, when thinking of particles, understand them as a certain image of waves and waves in themselves. It goes to the faith/fact conundrum. Again, speaking of myself only, I do not find much of a dilemma here. To me, faith does not deal with facts but rather with the attribution of facts. Of course, it is a deep issue, and this short remark cannot even begin to do justice to the issue. But you asked, and I did not want to be disrespectful. So, here is a short answer (sorry) rather than none at all.

64 posted on 05/02/2002 8:26:08 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
The Bible clearly shows that God is going to give "His Land" to Israel. Not because they deserve it, but because His great name is at stake – God cannot break a promise. It is after this that God will bring the Jews to repentance and give them a new heart. He will accomplish this through delivering them from a coming war that will almost destroy the world.

In addition, in Revelations, it is also made clear that those nations that do not stand with Israel will be destroyed.

65 posted on 05/02/2002 8:32:35 AM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Freemeorkillme
In addition, in Revelations, it is also made clear that those nations that do not stand with Israel will be destroyed.

Even the Christian masses don't quite believe this yet, do they?

66 posted on 05/02/2002 8:46:24 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
What makes you think that? Christians happen to be Israel's #1 allie. Certainly, one of the fundamental reasons for their support is biblical, would you not think?
67 posted on 05/02/2002 10:42:57 AM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
The First Amendment doesn't have the slightest bearing on which, if any, of FR's five separate forums the FR management chooses to place a posted article.

True. Agreed 100%.

The apparent confusion WRT my usage of "freedom of religion" and references to "First Amendment" and my possible misinterpretation of your use of the word, "it", has possibly caused you to conclude that I have an argument with the movement of articles (sometimes) from the original assignment by the person who posts the article.

You summonsed the Sidebar Moderator to consider moving the article to the religion forum. I rather obliquely disagreed with you on the basis that the Middle East catastrophe is in a large part based on the consequences exacted on one tribe as the result of another tribe's APPLICATION of religious FAITH. . . . altering FACTS as the result of FAITH.

In short, this article was properly placed by the original poster.

68 posted on 05/02/2002 4:55:52 PM PDT by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Freemeorkillme
What makes you think that?

I was speaking more of the people who voted AGAINST the supportive document today in Congress. Just thinking about the politicians -- shall we count them in or out?

69 posted on 05/02/2002 6:19:57 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
What makes you think that?

Just looking at some of the related threads on FR proves your point. BTW, did the supportive document pass today?

70 posted on 05/02/2002 8:00:30 PM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
Yes, my "it" was referring only to the posting of the article on FR.
71 posted on 05/03/2002 6:59:04 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson