Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/29/2002 6:10:33 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *WOD_list

2 posted on 04/29/2002 6:31:44 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Oh heck, just empty all the California prisons. There are enough groups justifying any crime anyway. Let's just save time, let them all out.
3 posted on 04/29/2002 6:43:00 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
In addition to these economic costs, are the gross violations of constitutional rights all in the name of the "War on Drugs".
4 posted on 04/29/2002 6:51:40 PM PDT by SkiBum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Sounds like something Carl the Greenskeeper would write.
5 posted on 04/29/2002 6:53:50 PM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
This country can NOT legalize drugs until the people are ready to accept seeing bodies laying in the streets. Drug addiction leads to death. Slow, lingering, horrible death. We cannot support drug addicts who only know that they can hardly wait for their next fix. They do not, can not, and will not work to support their habits.

Now you can argue that not all fit the category and that would be true, but the numbers are such that mere subsidation would bankrupt the society. I have seen the results of casual drug addiction with the knowledge that it is illegal and the force of addiction is so strong that continued use is almost assured.

Easy access to drugs would create a new class of addicts. Those that said, "well, now that it is legal, I will try it and, of course, I can quit anytime I want."

WRONG

These fools would jump to the hard core in no time and we would have a new crop of junkies to support. And so it goes.

The results of easy access to drugs is overdoses. Overdoses result in bodies laying in the streets. Now, you may argue that we could set up government stands (for lack of a better term) for supply to ensure that no one would get OD'ed.

Sorry, but it wouldn't work. The user, with his ever increasing need for 'the high' would only go to other government stands for a, yet stronger, fix! And so it goes.

Are you ready to wake up to the vision of a junkie, lying dead on your lawn and your 6 year old staring at the site? That, my friends, is the result of easy access hits!

Easy access to drugs = Janis Joplin, Easy access to drugs = John Belushi, Easy access to drugs = Kurt Cobain. Easy access to drugs = Jim Morrison.

And so it goes!

10 posted on 04/29/2002 7:08:32 PM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
* Be logical and refrain from hysteria which has been generated by politicians and hired advertising firms.

People who've been adversely affected by someone who uses illicit drugs know it isn't hysteria. That's why the overwhelming majority of people are in favor of keeping them illegal.

11 posted on 04/29/2002 7:22:10 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
* Realize legislating morality has been a destructive societal policy and that drug use and abuse are medical problems.

Sustainable societies have always had laws that reflect the morality of their dominant culture. The idea that laws and morality should be mutually exclusive is a canard usually perpetrated by a destructive subculture.

12 posted on 04/29/2002 7:26:47 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
I believe we should put Darwin's law into effect, and legalize all drugs. Give 'em all they want......it would put a little chlorine into California's gene pool......
13 posted on 04/29/2002 7:30:27 PM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
"In the past  12 years we have constructed 18 new prisons with five additional prisons  planned for construction. In our misguided effort of constructing 18 new  prisons, we have taken money from libraries, schools, sports, prevention  and music programs. "

He says that like it's a bad thing.

16 posted on 04/29/2002 8:17:56 PM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Realize legislating morality has been a destructive societal policy and that drug use and abuse are medical problems. * Take the profit out of drugs by ending prohibition

The above two points from the article, basically state the main problem with the WOD.
Profit and telling others what they can and can't do.
28 posted on 04/30/2002 6:48:16 AM PDT by vin-one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
SOURCE= American Probation and Parole Association!!!!

These guys are employed by the WOD. They depend on our tax dollars going towards the WOD for the food they eat. And they publish this?

Kudos and a Cheer from this ANTI-WOD Man!!

No new information but it nice to hear this from an inside source.

EBUCK

30 posted on 04/30/2002 11:17:06 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Drugs ruin people's lives. We must protect them from ruining their lives. Therefore we must send drug users to prisons.

Somehow I can't understand the logic behind that. But I'm sure some jackbooted jackass who supports the war on drugs will explain it to me.

38 posted on 05/01/2002 12:18:50 PM PDT by Rule of Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson