Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Impatient Bush Tells Israel To Withdraw "NOW"
Agence France-Presse (via ClariNet) ^

Posted on 04/26/2002 9:08:46 PM PDT by RCW2001

Copyright 2002 by Agence France-Presse (via ClariNet) / Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:30:08 PDT

</CLARI-ITEM HEADER>

Photo [Fri, Apr 26]
BETHLEHEM, WEST BANK, 26-APR-2002: Israeli soldiers cover the entrance of the Church of the Nativity as a stretcher is unloaded in the West Bank town of Bethlehem April 26, 2002. Two injured Palestinians were evacuated from the church under a heavy smoke screen set off by the army. [Photo by Mike Nelson, copyright 2002 by AFP and ClariNet] </CLARI-ITEM CAPTION>
</CLARI-ITEM PHOTO-TABLE>

CRAWFORD, Texas, April 26 (AFP) - An impatient President George W. Bush on Friday told Israel to halt its incursions into Palestinian areas "now", as UN Secretary General Kofi Annan delayed the arrival of a UN fact-finding mission to the refugee camp in Janin for one day.

"(The) Israelis understand my position. I've been very clear and there has been some progress, but it's now time to quit it altogether; it's time to end this," Bush said, making his second such appeal in two days.

The comments came one day after Bush's talks with Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz, in which the two leaders discussed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its implications for US relations with Arab countries.

Earlier Friday, Secretary of State Colin Powell spoke to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon by telephone, his spokesman Richard Boucher said.

The conversation centered on Israel's reluctance to let a United Nations fact-finding team enter Jenin refugee camp where the Palestinians claim a massacre took place.

The problem was resolved later in the day when Annan announced through his spokesman that the team would be in the region on Sunday.

Spokesman Fred Eckhard said "the Israeli Foreign Minister has requested that, due to the Israeli Sabbath, the team arrive on Sunday."

"Given these special circumstances, the secretary general has agreed to this request," he pointed out.

The breakthrough came after 24 hours of intermittent talks between senior UN officials and four Israeli envoys on the team's composition and its terms of reference.

Eckhard said the discussions took place in a "cordial and constructive atmosphere."

"Clarifications on the upcoming mission were provided by the UN," he added. The UN has been informed that the Israeli cabinet will make a formal decision on the matter on Sunday morning."

The team now comprises three full members: former Finnish president Martti Ahtisaari; Cornelio Sommaruga, the Swiss former head of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC); and Sadako Ogata of Japan, former UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

They have four advisers on military, police, legal and forensic questions; and the first military and police advisers each have two assistants.

Bush spoke amid signs of a rift within his foreign policy team, as several State Department officials admitted privately they were demoralized by administration infighting over the Middle East.

Pressure from the White House meanwhile, prompted Congress to delay legislation which branded Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat a "terrorist" after Bush aides it could hamper their peace efforts.

Bush first called for an end to the incursions, which Sharon's government says are targeting suicide bombers, on April 4, but later said he was satisfied with Israel's limited withdrawal.

The operation has besieged Arafat in his Ramallah compound and trapped armed Palestinians in Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity.

The White House said Friday that Crown Prince Abdullah had presented Bush with an eight point list of Middle East peace objectives.

The plan, which appears to be largely an amalgam of existing US and Saudi proposals for ending the bloody Israel-Palestinian conflict, recommends :

- An Israeli withdrawal from Palestinian-ruled areas taken over in recent incursions;

- A lifting of the Israeli siege of Ramallah;

- The creation of a multinational peace force for the territories;

- The reconstruction of Palestinian infrastructure devastated by the fighting;

- Talks on US security plans, including the Tenet work plan and the Mitchell plan;

- The halting of Israeli settlement building;

- A renunciation of violence by both sides;

- A concerted US attempt to implement UN resolution 242 passed in 1967, which called for an Israeli withdrawal from occupied Arab lands.

Late Friday, the Israeli army pulled its troops out from the northern West Bank city of Qalqilya, Israeli military sources said.

Israeli troops backed by 15 armored vehicles and two helicopters had entered the town before dawn, killing a local leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).

Raed Nazel, accused by Israel of multiple attacks on Jewish settlers in the West Bank, was gunned down in the exchange of gunfire, Israeli officials said.

Up to 20 militants were picked up in Qalqilya and three villages between the towns of Nablus and Jenin, Israeli officials said.

The US House of Representatives meanwhile postponed a vote on a resolution branding Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat a terrorist, under pressure from the Bush administration which judged it could hamper its Middle East peace efforts.

The move was ordered by Majority whip Tom Delay on Friday after a call from the White House, his spokesman said.

The bill states support for Israel and castigates Arafat, accusing him of "ongoing support and coordination of terror, and doubts he is still a "partner for peace."

Whispers that the Bush administration is badly split on Middle East policy Friday burst into the open, as several State Department officials admitted to frustration.

"There is a feeling that we are directionless, and that has created a lot of resentment and some anger," said one official, referring to a "generally gloomy mood" at the State Department as it battles the White House and Pentagon for control of Middle East policy.

The crisis will top the agenda at a meeting of the Middle East "quartet," which the State Department said Friday would meet in Washington on May 2.

The panel is made up of the United States, the European Union, the United Nations and Russia.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2002 9:08:46 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Israel should reply: "Just as soon as the crooks come out of the Church of the Nativity, we'll be happy to withdraw".OK, Yassir, your turn.
2 posted on 04/26/2002 9:10:53 PM PDT by exit82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"There is a feeling that we are directionless, and that has created a lot of resentment and some anger," said one official, referring to a "generally gloomy mood" at the State Department as it battles the White House and Pentagon for control of Middle East policy.

God, I love the smell of insubordination in the morning!

3 posted on 04/26/2002 9:13:12 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
GW's strategy: Say something different everyday. Whenever pressure is applied, coalesce, then when criticized, say something else. But by all means, DO NOT be consistent!! That way one stays unpredictable!! No one ever really knows which end is up so all parties end up going crazy! Yeah, that's the ticket!!
4 posted on 04/26/2002 9:18:14 PM PDT by whadizit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Bush did not sound all that firm when he asked Israel to withdraw.
5 posted on 04/26/2002 9:26:32 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
He shouldn't have said it at all, and I hope that privately, Sharon tells him to shove it up his clymer.
6 posted on 04/26/2002 9:34:41 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Actually, the correct title says "now." Not "NOW". Sounds like you are more 'impatient' than he is. LOL...
7 posted on 04/26/2002 9:34:52 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Actually, the correct title says "now." Not "NOW". Sounds like you are more 'impatient' than he is.

Sounds to me like you need something, more rewarding, to do that to the 'capitalization', letter by letter, of posted articles... LOL!!!

8 posted on 04/26/2002 9:41:44 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: veronica
BTW...you missed the one where I spelled Abdullah wrong in "another" thread. :) Shame, shame...
9 posted on 04/26/2002 9:44:03 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
The pursuit of truth is one sort of rewarding venture. :)
10 posted on 04/26/2002 9:45:48 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
If you change the emphasis of a word in a posted article without telling us you did so, then you are presenting the article under false pretences. We think we are getting this article as it appeared in the press; actually we are getting it as spun by RCW.
11 posted on 04/26/2002 9:46:13 PM PDT by Southern Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
You anti Semites really like what the French have to say about world affairs.
12 posted on 04/26/2002 9:46:53 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I am not an expert on the spelling of Arab names. Don't much care about that.
13 posted on 04/26/2002 9:47:38 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
More crud from the French and the Jew obsessed and Israel obsessed RCW2001
14 posted on 04/26/2002 9:49:20 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southern Federalist
I provided a workable link and left the original 'searchable' character string of the title intact.

BooHoo....so just 'how were you harmed by this?? A couple more readers to an article of perhaps something you don't want somebody to read?

Forum rules, if I remember correctly states to 'use the original title'...well this IS the original title.

Did it 'really' influence you THAT much...??

15 posted on 04/26/2002 9:56:20 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
God, I love the smell of insubordination in the morning!

Bump...I am beginning to believe that GWB is just about fed up with the 'insubordination' and could care less if he is a 2 term President. He will do what he think is right...and to hell with polls and paid shills.

I grow more confident with his leadership everyday, as of late.

16 posted on 04/26/2002 10:00:49 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I grow more confident with his leadership everyday, as of late.

Me too. :) And of his being reelected. What with all the Jews turning right and joining the GOP. :) They notice he's doing such a great job fighting terroism, he has supported Israel doing the same, and of course he refuses to meet with Arafat, refusing to give in to the 'paid shills', and various Middle East 'Princes.'

17 posted on 04/26/2002 10:08:29 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
PS - If you do not think he wants a second term you are smoking something. All Presidents want a second term, but GW in particular I believe. The final avenging by the son for the loss the father suffered. The loss that put the Arkansas Hillbillies in the WH.
18 posted on 04/26/2002 10:12:22 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I like Bush's leadership also but wish he would stop trying to appease the arabs.
19 posted on 04/26/2002 10:18:31 PM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
If you are suggesting that when you post an article, FReepers should use links to see what the article really says, then it sound a great deal as though you are admitting that you do doctor the articles you post.

In this instance, you did not, in fact, post with the original title; you altered the emphasis in the title to give the impression that the President was angry at Israel. This particular instance is not a big deal, but the principle involved is a big principle. If you want to make a point or interpret an article, do the work of writing an accompanying post, maybe actually offer an argument, don't fiddle with the article.

Doing something wrong and then saying "Boo hoo" when someone calls you on it is a very junior-high kind of bluff. Most FReepers, I suspect, have already done junior high and are not likely to find it clever.

20 posted on 04/26/2002 10:30:55 PM PDT by Southern Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson