Skip to comments.
The Neo-Con Assault on the Constitution
Lewrockwell.com ^
| April 25, 2002
| Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Posted on 04/25/2002 9:41:56 AM PDT by Korth
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-255 next last
1
posted on
04/25/2002 9:41:57 AM PDT
by
Korth
To: Korth
Bump
2
posted on
04/25/2002 9:53:28 AM PDT
by
AUgrad
To: outlawcam
FYI
To: Korth
may as well throw Bill Bennett in with that "neo-Con" bunch, too.
To: Korth
Im against the WOD but Im also against Neoconfederate Lincoln bashing nonsense.
5
posted on
04/25/2002 10:03:38 AM PDT
by
weikel
To: Korth
A bunch of people will just look at the URL and disregard this article out of hand, unfortunately. Lew is sometimes off his rocker though, but this doesn't appear to be one of those cases as such. I only glanced through the article though, admittedly.
6
posted on
04/25/2002 10:04:28 AM PDT
by
WyldKard
To: weikel; stainlessbanner; Constitution Day
Why? He was the one that began centralizing the government and gave it the power that it uses today against the citizens of the respective states
Ping guys, good article from Mr. DiLorenzo
7
posted on
04/25/2002 10:07:09 AM PDT
by
billbears
To: Korth
Lincoln established the supremacy of federal authority over the rights of the state governments. FDR established the supremacy of federal authority over the rights of the individual.
To: tacticalogic
Lincoln established the supremacy of federal authority over the rights of the state governments. FDR established the supremacy of federal authority over the rights of the individual.Great point!!
9
posted on
04/25/2002 10:10:06 AM PDT
by
AUgrad
To: weikel
Dittos. What the Lincoln haters really are saying is that they wish the USA was not one country. They will try to cover this by suggesting that the south would hve abolished slavery and rejoined the USA on their own, but in reality the opposite is more likely; other states would have split off over time when they disagreed with Federal policy. And without a USA we would probably be living under Nazism or Communism today.
10
posted on
04/25/2002 10:10:58 AM PDT
by
Hugin
To: 4ConservativeJustices
Ping!! A DiLorenzo article
To: billbears
Look all the big government crap started in the 1910's with the "progressives"(communists). Ive been over this a million times. Lincoln had been dead almost 50 years before big Government started.
12
posted on
04/25/2002 10:13:46 AM PDT
by
weikel
To: Korth
Lew Rockwell is off his rocker, 99.9% of the time. I may not like Alan Keyes, but truth be told, he was never a liberal, hence he isn't a neo-con. Of course, when it comes to the truth, Rockwell is a seriously lost soul.
To: Hugin
What the Lincoln haters really are saying is that they wish the USA was not one country...And without a USA we would probably be living under Nazism or Communism today. Yeah, it's a real good thing the fed ignores the 10th Amendment. You see, if the states were allowed to decide things like the drinking age and the speed limit, the communist hordes would overrun us in no time at all!
14
posted on
04/25/2002 10:17:41 AM PDT
by
freeeee
To: Korth
Lotsa bilge and falsehoods in that essay. Same old misunderstandings of the 10th amendment and incorrect history wrt State's Rights. Same falsehoods wrt Lincoln. Crap in short and more crap.
To: billbears
BTTT
To: AUgrad
No it is a falsehood. The U.S. Constitution established the relation between the federal government and the individual citizen.
To: freeeee
Yeah, it's a real good thing the fed ignores the 10th Amendment. You see, if the states were allowed to decide things like the drinking age and the speed limit, the communist hordes would overrun us in no time at all! I see, rather than respond to my points, you change the subject. A sure sign that you have no response.
18
posted on
04/25/2002 10:23:32 AM PDT
by
Hugin
To: weikel
I don't care what you've been over. Facts are facts. What about the Union-Pacific railroad? Who funded that? The Mexicans? No it was the United StateS federal government!! It was an 'internal improvement' plan, much like the ones from Illinois and other northern states that failed so miserably in the 1830s and 1840s. Before the War, it had never been done, because such scams were illegal and even banned in every state constitution. It was bankrupt within a year after it was finished building. And suprisingly enough, less than 20 years later the Northern Transcontinental was built without one federal government red cent!! Even went on to make a little money. How about that? Of course this is just documented history, along with a military invasion by the federal government of the South that lasted ten years and we are still feeling the repercussions of that 'occupation'. This doesn't even begin to cover the corruption of the elected state officials down here during that time which were carpetbaggers or Southern scalawags, all with complete approval by none other than the United StateS federal government. lincoln might have been dead, but it wasn't fifty years before his plans came to fruition, it was more like 5
To: billbears
The railroad subsidies started before the Civil War you can't blame that one on Lincoln more like Hamilton and Henry Clay.
20
posted on
04/25/2002 10:26:45 AM PDT
by
weikel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-255 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson