Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
ABout your post #50.

It would seem that the DA is now dropping the pornography charges. What think ye of this ?

442 posted on 04/30/2002 11:53:25 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
What do I think about it? Well let's remember that the charge that this man was interested in kiddie-porn was a supporting piece of information when the charges were brought. "Look, here's a guy who's got kiddie-porn on his computer, obviously that material appeals to him, and young kids would be his natural preference. That's just one more reason why we arrested him."

Well, one down. If we now find out that Brenda and he had a relationship, or that Danielle was known to go over to Westerfield's, as other kids "may" have, then we've basicly shot down the main evidence against him. Couple that with the documented evidence that Damen was known to frequent the area where Danielle's body was found and this case vaporizes.

I see a rocky road for the prosecution. I also question why they zeroed in on Westerfield in the first place. I still say Brenda dropped a hint and the police bit. I have no way of knowing this, but I think Westerfield has been the fall guy, not necessarily the perp.

Those who may read these comments out of context should note that I want Westerfield to fry if he did it. I just want to make sure the actual perp isn't getting off scott free.

444 posted on 04/30/2002 12:05:08 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson