Skip to comments.
PROSECUTORS TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY IN WESTERFIELD CASE
Union Tribune/KFMB ^
| April 25, 2002
| Harry Jones
Posted on 04/25/2002 9:15:24 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660, 661-680, 681-700, 701-718 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, for umpteenth time, the AWOL charge was a typo in the first place. It never existed. It only appeared on the internet. I know you'd like it to be real, but it's not. I gather you chose not to call the SDPD about that? Some folks did, plus his ex brother in law also says it never happened.
To: MizSterious
Note....just checked, current date....5-1
INMATE DETAIL
Information is current as of last update: 05/01/2002
The data contained in these files is updated only once a day and should not be relied upon for any type of legal action.
PERSONAL |
|
ARREST |
Last: |
WESTERFIELD |
Agency: |
|
First: |
DAVID |
Location: |
|
Middle: |
A |
Hold Codes: |
|
Sex: |
M |
Bail Amount: |
$ 0 |
Race: |
W |
Facility: |
1 |
Date of Birth: |
02/25/1952 |
Cell: |
05 |
Age: |
50 |
Booking Date: |
02/22/2002 |
Height: |
6'02" |
Booking Time: |
15:24 |
Weight: |
210 lbs |
Booking Nbr: |
02109697 |
|
ReBook Code: |
2 |
|
CHARGES: |
Description |
Code |
Statute |
Warrant Nbr |
Primary: |
MRDR:1ST DEG:S |
PC |
187(A) PC |
|
Second: |
|
|
|
|
Third: |
|
|
|
|
Fourth: |
|
|
|
|
Fifth: |
|
|
|
|
|
COURT: |
Destination Court |
Date |
Time |
|
Appearance 1: |
SD40 |
04/18/2002 |
08:30 |
|
Appearance 2: |
SD40 |
05/02/2002 |
10:00 |
To: Amore
I believe they said that none of the charges had been dropped. The topic had a thread of its own on Jameson's.
To: FresnoDA
Romantic involvement? The connotation is of some emotional attachment, warm fuzzies if you will. She could certainly say no, absolutely not, when the act was simple animalistic mating ritual strictly for one's own pleasure.
684
posted on
05/01/2002 6:57:25 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Valpal1, Amore
(M) To prove the special circumstances of kidnapping in subparagraph (B), or arson in subparagraph (H), if there is specific intent to kill, it is only required that there be proof of the elements of those felonies. If so established, those two special circumstances are proven even if the felony of kidnapping or arson is committed primarily or solely for the purpose of facilitating the murder
Sounds to me like the victim doesn't have to know he/she is being kidnapped? Or am I wrong about that?
To: MizSterious
Thanks for the info/heads up about the charges.
To: MizSterious
I believe they said that none of the charges had been dropped. The topic had a thread of its own on Jameson's.Thanks. One of these days I'll get over there and check out the site. It's been hectic here lately.
687
posted on
05/01/2002 7:04:03 AM PDT
by
Amore
To: Amore, ValPal1, UCANSEE2
I believe this is the thread mizsterious refers to.
"WESTERFIELD - - charges dropped??"
http://64.225.95.82/dcf/Danielle/2090.html
Here is a copy of post number 21:
21 . "OK - I have the answers"
Posted by jameson on Apr-30-02 at 05:16 PM (EST) The charges were not dropped - the court doesn't know what the Sheriff's pages list and would warn us all not to take that page to seriously.
The court this week is to review motions, determine what may be released to the public and what will remain sealed.
It may be in the courtroom, but I couldn't find out for sure - - it could be held behind closed doors.
To: Amore, ValPal1, UCANSEE2
When people say confirmed, I wish they's show their source in situations like this..here's another post in that thread.
23 . "correct" Posted by John_Boy on Apr-30-02 at 06:05 PM (EST) verified what Jams has said is in fact true, there may be more of these put on the courts calendar depending on issues that arise. i also know of a few issues that may be fair fodder for these motions hearings regarding the defense trying to get certain items and having to "chase them down." those may go away since it sounds like everything they have sought has now been located...let the vagueness begin! (is that a word?)
To: FresnoDA
Note....just checked, current date....5-1 I suspect that they have a computer program (*CGI*) that updates the dates on all of their pages automatically.
To: MizSterious
UM, I don't recall you ever pointing out a quote from the brother-in-law to me about the AWOL charge, so that is your FIRST time addressing it to me... not the UPTEENTH, as you so joyously posted. Regardless, got a source?
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
It's not there nor has it been on the Sheriff's site for some time. It was determined that David was NEVER in the military in order for him to go AWOL. Reporters figured that out.
692
posted on
05/01/2002 7:41:11 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Nope, it's the umpteenth, it's been mentioned many times before by both Rolling_stone and me, and possibly others. It's been mentioned on many threads. Like the transcripts links, I suspect you didn't bother to read these posts. That's your failing, not mine. They were addressed to you specifically.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Be wary of people who claim inside knowledge on this (or any other) case. On the internet, anyone can claim to be anything. We've come across a lot of frauds in this case--probably happens in every case (for example, the "forensic scientist" I encountered.) I trust what Jameson says, but am not so sure about John_Boy; I have no idea who he really is, just that he gives out a lot of cryptic information that might or might not be the real deal--but in most cases is too vague to matter anyway. That's why I suggested you make your own calls on some of these things that can be verified by phone. That way you can know for sure. Phone calls, even during business hours, don't cost that much these days.
To: MizSterious
Be wary of people who claim inside knowledge on this (or any other) case. On the internet, anyone can claim to be anything. Now that is wise advice and we agree on that point. I received a freepmail awhile back, from someone who sent me a link about jameson. I'll see if I can track it down for you.
To: MizSterious
Finally found it.
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/nebula/9337/jameson.html
DISCLAIMER: I am just passing this along and just because I pass it along, doesn't mean I agree with it.
To: MizSterious
Here's the first link the freeper sent to me.
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/nebula/9337/48hours.html
DISCLAIMER: I am just passing this along and just because I pass it along, doesn't mean I agree with it.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
From Ned? That person has an axe to grind.
698
posted on
05/01/2002 8:38:45 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Jaded
To: Jaded
I'll tell you, it's a freeper..but I really don't know if it's ned or not. (they used freepmail) The freeper handle is one I'm not familiar with. I do believe he/she is lurking...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660, 661-680, 681-700, 701-718 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson