Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Commercial Fishermen Sue Government for More Water in Oregon's Klamath River
AP Breaking, via TBO.com ^ | 25 April 2002 | Jeff Barnard

Posted on 04/24/2002 9:14:42 PM PDT by Vigilant1

By Jeff Barnard Associated Press Writer
Published: Apr 25, 2002

MEDFORD, Ore. (AP) - Arguing that fishermen have as much right to water as farmers, commercial anglers filed a lawsuit Wednesday demanding the federal government release more water to the Klamath River.

The lawsuit claims the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation is "playing fast and loose with the Endangered Species Act," and seeks a federal court order requiring that water being stored for farmers be released to help young salmon migrate to the ocean.

"Fishermen deserve a fair share of water in the river just as much as farmers deserve water in the fields," said Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

During a drought last year, the Bureau of Reclamation sharply cut back irrigation to maintain water levels set under the Endangered Species Act for endangered suckers in Upper Klamath Lake and threatened coho salmon in the Klamath River.

This year the Bush administration has promised to do all it can to ensure Klamath Reclamation Project farmers get the water they need.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Oakland, Calif., against the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the National Marine Fisheries Service.

The bureau has begun full irrigation deliveries to the 1,400 farms on the Klamath Reclamation Project, which straddles the Oregon-California state line east of the Cascade Range.

Spain said the extra water for fish should not affect irrigation for farmers, but farmers disagreed.

Dan Keppen of the Klamath Water Users' Association estimated more water for salmon would use about 60,000 acre feet of water from reserves needed to meet the government's commitment to 400,000 acre feet for irrigation.

Bureau of Reclamation spokesman Jeff McCracken said attorneys had not reviewed the lawsuit and declined comment on the allegations.

Jim Lecky, assistant regional director of the National Marine Fisheries Service, was out of the office and did not immediately return a telephone call for comment.

AP-ES-04-24-02 2359EDT


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: fishing; klamath; klamathbasincrisis; klamathlist; waterrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2002 9:14:42 PM PDT by Vigilant1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
"Fishermen deserve a fair share of water in the river just as much as farmers deserve water in the fields,"

Question: I know that the farmers pay for the water. Do the fishermen? If not then the argument is invalid.

a.cricket

2 posted on 04/24/2002 9:22:19 PM PDT by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine;68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alphadog; amom; Anonymous2...
ping
3 posted on 04/24/2002 10:05:22 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *Klamath_list;editor-surveyor;farmfriend

4 posted on 04/24/2002 10:09:00 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marsh2; dixiechick2000; Helen; Mama_Bear; poet; Grampa Dave; doug from upland; WolfsView...
Ask if you want to be removed or added.
5 posted on 04/24/2002 10:16:31 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
"Fishermen deserve a fair share of water in the river just as much as farmers deserve water in the fields,"

Guess they haven't heard that the farmers own the water.

6 posted on 04/24/2002 10:19:17 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1; sasquatch; Iconoclast2; forester; marsh2; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; farmfriend; Phil V.
"Fishermen deserve a fair share of water in the river just as much as farmers deserve water in the fields," said Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Glen Spain is a lawyer operating out of the Presidio in San Francisco, right down the hall from Gorbachev's Green Cross International. Spain has made a career out of these sweetheart suits "against" NMFS and is trying to corner the fishing business in the entire Pacific. It was he who was behind the steelhead and coho listings as funded by Pew Charitable Trusts (Sunoco, oil money). They are after water and hydro-power and don't give a dam for the fish. The coho in the Southern ESU is under appeal for delisting because the data have proven fraudulent. The data for the steelhead listing as Threatened were a total joke. This man is a crook.

7 posted on 04/24/2002 10:24:25 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Part V, Chapter 2. He's in there.
8 posted on 04/24/2002 10:25:30 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Thanks, I'll pass that along to Jay as well. I usually e-mail a link to him. Looking for my copy now. Going to have to finish that one of these days.
9 posted on 04/24/2002 10:29:31 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
"Fishermen deserve a fair share of water in the river just as much as farmers deserve water in the fields," said Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

If I remember correctly from last year's articles, Glen Spain is an enviro-whaco lawyer, not a commercial fisherman, and the PCFFA has no connection to or endorsement from any commercial fishermen. So how does such a scumbag get to claim legal standing to sue over water and land to which he has no legitimate interest?

10 posted on 04/24/2002 10:35:22 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
"Fishermen deserve a fair share of water in the river just as much as farmers deserve water in the fields," said Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

If I remember correctly from last year's articles, Glen Spain is an enviro-whaco lawyer, not a commercial fisherman, and the PCFFA has no connection to or endorsement from any commercial fishermen. So how does such a scumbag get to claim legal standing to sue over water and land to which he has no legitimate interest?

11 posted on 04/24/2002 10:36:48 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
"Glen Spain is a lawyer...This man is a crook."

Stands to reason.

12 posted on 04/24/2002 10:38:19 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
You should have seen it here in Santa Cruz. Earth Firsters were claiming that river fishing was a significant part of their diet.
13 posted on 04/24/2002 10:49:21 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: another cricket
Question: I know that the farmers pay for the water. Do the fishermen? If not then the argument is invalid.

That is the way I see it also.

14 posted on 04/24/2002 11:23:40 PM PDT by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Interesting he is in same complex as Gorbachov who was working with water interests in meetings and symposiums. Any more info on these two. Ed Hubel.
15 posted on 04/25/2002 1:11:41 AM PDT by hubel458
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: another cricket
Question: I know that the farmers pay for the water. Do the fishermen? If not then the argument is invalid. a.cricket

However the government is interfering with the natural migration of salmon and upsetting the ecosystem.

16 posted on 04/25/2002 3:55:17 AM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Do you have any history we can look at at about this crook?
17 posted on 04/25/2002 4:40:09 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hubel458
I know someone (a real fisherman) who hates his guts and chases after his messes constantly. I would not make an inquiry unless there was specific interest in a particular legal action. I'd need evidence of commitment and resources before I'd call.
18 posted on 04/25/2002 6:08:10 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: another cricket; carry okie; iconoclast2
This response/reply by you is incredible. It needs to be used by the Farmers/Ranchers in the Klamath Basin:

"Fishermen deserve a fair share of water in the river just as much as farmers deserve water in the fields,"

Question: I know that the farmers pay for the water. Do the fishermen? If not then the argument is invalid.

another cricket

19 posted on 04/25/2002 9:31:05 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
However the government is interfering with the natural migration of salmon and upsetting the ecosystem.

So is your house. Should the farmers bear the exclusive burden to meet your demand for Natural on your behalf because you have already paved your piece of Nature? That is the essence of democratic takings.

20 posted on 04/25/2002 9:36:21 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson