Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If we must go to war, let's not go Dutch
The Guardian ^ | April 24 2002 | Ian Buruma

Posted on 04/24/2002 3:48:33 PM PDT by knighthawk

Wim Kok did the honourable thing. He was prime minister when more than 7,000 Bosnian Muslims under the protection of Dutch UN peacekeepers were slaughtered by Serb troops. The Dutch battalion (Dutchbat), unwilling to risk their own lives, handed the victims over to their butchers. So last week, after the publication of an exhaustive Dutch report, Wim Kok took responsibility - not for the killings, of course, but for having let them happen under his watch.

Such a principled move is rare enough. The French, whose dealings with the Serbs were often dubious, to say the least, never did anything of the kind. Politics had something to with all this. Kok's term as the benign patriarch of a left-right coalition government was beginning to come unstuck anyway. Still, it was a gentlemanly way to go.

The question is how Dutchbat got suckered into such a ghastly situation in the first place. What did they think they were doing in July 1995, scattered about in so-called observation posts around Srebrenica, lightly armed, without proper intelligence and with nowhere near enough men to take on the Serb army?

When they were offered secret equipment by the CIA to intercept Serb communications, they turned it down, apparently because it would not have been in line with UN directives. And close air support, from Nato fighters, was denied them by the UN, because of fear that the Serbs might take more UN personnel as hostages. To promise protection to Bosnian civilians under such circumstances was folly. No other country - not France, not Britain, let alone the US - would ever have accepted such a mission. But the Dutch did, and now they are stuck with a reputation for being collaborators in mass murder. How could they have been so foolish?

One salient fact about my compatriots is how hardnosed, even ruthless, they can be in business, and how naive they often are in international affairs. This is the result, I suppose, of having been a mercantile nation for more than 300 years. The last Dutch military victories - apart from crushing the odd native rebellion in the East Indies - were against the English in the 17th century. Holland was spent as a military power when the British took over the seas. After that, business was all.

Like true merchants, the Dutch have often assumed that they could stay out of trouble, as long as they kept their heads down when the big boys went to war. A policy of neutrality kept them out of the first world war, and like true naifs, they thought they could get away with it again when Hitler started to help himself to chunks of Europe. Alas, virtually all the Dutch had to put up against the Nazi Heinkels and Messerschmitts were a handful of Fokker biplanes.

After the war, the Dutch became a nation of do-gooders and moralists. The do-gooding - huge amounts of development aid, diplomatic initiatives against Greek colonels and so on - was often a fine thing; the moralising, often less so. There is something presumptuous about a small country in Europe taking on the role as the "guiding nation" (gidsland) in international morality. But in 1995, the Dutch, to their credit, knew that preaching and doling out money were not enough. Something more had to be done about ethnic cleansing in Europe. And so they decided to punch above their weight.

The idea that Dutch troops in UN blue helmets could cope with an army on the rampage was as naive as the assumption that Hitler could be kept away by neutrality. The fact that neither the UN, nor any of the larger powers, did anything to help them, was something worse than naive.

For the sorry tale of Dutch do-gooding contains some pointers which reach well beyond the borders of Holland. First, it should cure us of any illusion that sending UN peacekeepers on military missions can end in anything but disaster. Soldiers cannot be neutral in a war. Some misguided people may really have believed that the presence of blue helmets would stop the Serbs from their murderous enterprise. But, in fact, the UN troops offered a handy reason for Britain, France, and the US, powers that could actually have made a difference, not even to try. The Dutch did not get air support because blue helmets were at risk. The UN stood in the way of a military solution. And that suited London, Paris and Washington fine.

In fact, the UN has been used as an alibi for much more than inaction in the former Yugoslavia. The notion that the UN can solve military crises has been an excuse for, as it were, the Dutchification of much of Europe. Most Europeans after the second world war, with the possible exception of some Brits, but certainly including the Germans, wanted to be like the Dutch since the 17th century: prosperous traders with strong neutralist tendencies. European power and pride would be economic, or cultural, but no longer invested in war.

A glance at British royal funerals shows that military pride, and a flair for soldierly pomp, is still part of the British sense of nationhood. The flame of French gloire has not been totally extinguished yet either. But, by and large, postwar Europe has disarmed. When we are faced with serious violence, we look to the UN. And when the UN cannot stop it, the Americans must be prevailed upon. And then, often as not, we moralise, call them cowboys and earn their contempt. The Dutch took the rap for it but the massacre at Srebrenica is really the responsibility of all Europeans, including, in this instance, the British. For when you are faced by killers, do-gooding no longer does good.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: balkans; dutch; dutchbat; europe; thenetherlands; unpeacekeepers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Wim Kok did not do 'the honourable thing', he took the path of the least resistance. The week after the cabinet fell, there would have been an debate about this, and Kok evaded that debate. May 15 there will be elections, and Kok knew the PvdA (socialists) will even lose more voters when the other parties tear him and the other PvdA ministers to shreds.
1 posted on 04/24/2002 3:48:33 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; itsahoot; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri...
Ping
2 posted on 04/24/2002 3:49:14 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; Yehuda; Billthedrill; bjcintennessee; nmh; 4Freedom
FYI
3 posted on 04/24/2002 3:49:59 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; *Balkans
BUMP
4 posted on 04/24/2002 3:56:06 PM PDT by Dragonfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; spar
A very interesting article. A little too hard on the Dutch - "Dutchification" and the implication that the rest of Western Europe doesn't "moralise." But the writer is Dutch and angry at what happened, I suppose.
5 posted on 04/24/2002 4:01:14 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
It's a good thing the govt fell. If a right-of-center govt can take power, the Dutch can be a true leader in Europe. That means Dutch kids exiting university will actually have to *work* instead of living off their 'uitkering', while they "find themselves".
6 posted on 04/24/2002 4:01:42 PM PDT by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Hey, where did you learnt the word 'uitkering'?

Here is another: 'bijstand' (is also a form of 'uitkering')

7 posted on 04/24/2002 4:04:32 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I cannot blame people for thinking this way. It is really sad what happened there. It could have been avoided. And now the government (although fallen, they still work) wants to send troops to Macadonia!
8 posted on 04/24/2002 4:07:20 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
What does "uitkering" mean?
9 posted on 04/24/2002 4:24:41 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Translates as "unemployment."
10 posted on 04/24/2002 4:30:06 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The "massacre" in Srebrenica is the biggest hoax of the 90s.
11 posted on 04/24/2002 4:31:07 PM PDT by Banat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
There are not enough words of praise I can bestow upon the Serbs for their liberation of Srebrenica.
12 posted on 04/24/2002 4:32:16 PM PDT by Spar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Heineken?
13 posted on 04/24/2002 4:46:51 PM PDT by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sussex
A bump for you my friend. Any "similarities" herein?
14 posted on 04/24/2002 4:48:02 PM PDT by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
This can't be from the "Guardian". You're obviously pulling our leg.

For when you are faced by killers, do-gooding no longer does good.

I'm still flabbergasted at how this got by the editors. Good article!

15 posted on 04/24/2002 4:50:03 PM PDT by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Wim Kok did not do 'the honourable thing', he took the path of the least resistance.

No. In a Parliamentary Democracy, when there is a large scandal, the government is supposed to resign.

16 posted on 04/24/2002 5:06:19 PM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Thanks for the lesson in Dutch. I'm glad the government resigned. Unfortunately, the Dutch army has been a joke since when?? 1946??? What were the U.N. rules of engagement at the massacre?? I am sure that U.S. troops would not have stood by and let a massacre happen...
17 posted on 04/24/2002 5:14:55 PM PDT by Dutchy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Oh, by the way, I love your profile page. In return, let me just say, "Thank God for Rembrandt, van Gogh, Corrie ten Boom, tulips, Heineken and Johan Cruyff."
18 posted on 04/24/2002 5:19:59 PM PDT by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutchy
If US troops had been ordered to protect the people, they would have gone out fighting. There'd probably be a memorial in Srebrenica to the brave Americans who sacrificed their lives against impossible odds. And the Bosnians would be ratting out Al-Qaeda cells as fast as they could find them.
19 posted on 04/24/2002 5:30:19 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Agreed. I have full confidence in our military forces. They have never let us down in 226 years, as depicted in Black Hawk Down, We were Soldiers, to name a few recent films....
20 posted on 04/24/2002 5:39:42 PM PDT by Dutchy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson