[TopQuark]

And the multi-culturalist proclaimed: "Thou shalt view all cultures to be created equal."

KnightHawk: thank you for the link.

[TopQuark]

FYI

[Black Agnes]

ping

[Lent]

and he performs Jihad.

But of course he does. What would the Muslim Personality be without the Jihad?

[EggsAckley]

He distinguishes true thought from false when he measures it against the Islamic Aqeedah and builds it on the Aqeedah in its capacity as an intellectual basis. So his mentality is formed over this Aqeedah. This intellectual basis, the Aqeedah, thus provides him with a distinct mentality and a true criterion for thoughts. It thus safeguards him against erroneous thought; he expels false thought and remains honest in his thought and sound in his comprehension.

I see. So through this "religion," the human perception of right and wrong is subservient to the "intellectual basis"
Aqeedah, thus allowing the human to tell bald-faced lies and act out in "wrong" ways, with no fear of punishment.

[crystalk]

Murderously xenophobic, bloodthirsty but cowardly, whining constantly, beggarly, demanding of baksheesh, duplicitous, vindictive, constantly at war with everyone outside their own bloodline, criminally abusive toward women and children, effeminate, prone to homosexuality and bestiality, abusive of boys between 7 and 17; totally intolerant of any other belief systems, dishonest and totally unfaithful to contracts, treaties, or credit arrangements.

Makes a hellhole anywhere it rules, then sends its people out to make others' lands a hellhole also.

Wants to turn the clock back to the Dark Ages, resists all innovation and modernity, insists on massive overpopulation and thus drowns in its own excess births.

Parasitic. Without a Christian area outside it could batten upon, would have collapsed of its own weight long ago.

[Maceman]

Islam has provided a complete treatment for man to form for him a specific personality, which is distinct from all others.

I'll say.

As far as I can see, a good description of the Muslim personality is someone who will give you the shirt off his back, but if you don't put it on right away he will hack you to death with a sword and kill your entire family.

[knighthawk]

Thanks for posting it! The world needs to see how these people think. If we do not see that danger we are lost or going to be enslaved. Just look at the way the site looks. Very professional, it not done by a buch of simple loonies, these people are part of a organization that spans from the UK to Indonesia.

Links to their organizations

Also from that same site:

The "Democratic" Dictatorship of the West

Democracy is an idea that many have heard and support but few understand. Unfortunately for the world's population, it is the basis of international politics today. Democracy is not just 'an' idea but 'the' idea and is propagated with almost religious zeal. The setters of 'what is right' are the capitalist west, led by the USA; the most arrogant nation of them all. She prides herself, as does the U.K., as being the bastion of all that is good in world civilisation, arrogantly deciding what is right and who is evil. She haughtily props herself up as the owner of the ideal system for all, democracy. Any nation not following her system is labelled as oppressive, backward and dictatorial. Thus, 'undemocratic' has become a dirty word and nations that are put in this category are attacked for being unrepresentative of the will of their people. This attack will not spare the soon to be established Islamic state. Hence, it has become necessary to scrutinise this 'democracy' of the standard bearer to prove that it is nothing but a slogan shouted out to the world to intimidate it. In reality, neither of the ruling politicians in the USA or Britain are representative of their people and secondly to expose the fact that as an idea, democracy is inherently flawed.

The first aspect to mention is regarding how only the rich and powerful can influence elections, and thus the setting of legislation. It is a well-known fact that the only people who can independently stand for election are the rich. The US Presidential elections of 2000 are a case in point. Prospective candidates, Al Gore and George W Bush, are both millionaires in their own right. This wealth enables them to wield the influence that is required to be nominated as front-runners for their respective parties. In fact, for most of the 200-year history of the U.S. there have only been two parties both similar in nature, the Democrats and the Republicans. The U.S. is not really a multi-party state at all and therefore is no different to most third world countries, the same countries that it criticises for their lack of political pluralism.

Another contradiction is that many of the candidates receive large donations from big business to help them get elected. In the current campaign, Bush has raised over a $100 million in contributions (a record) for his campaign mostly from large companies. Gore has managed to raise similar amounts from some of the same companies. Now pause here for a second. One should ask why would large successful capitalist businesses that carefully scrutinise every investment for financial return give so much money for 'free' to presidential candidates? The answer is surely obvious to anyone who is not a politician. The presidential candidates will seek to ensure that the interests of those companies are protected once they assumed the Oval office. In any normal political language these contributions would be viewed as what they are, a form of institutionalised bribery and corruption on a mass scale. It is this mass funding, and the subsequent alliances made, that ensure that the country is run for the interests of the large multinationals rather than for the common man.

Compare this deep-rooted financial corruption within the West to the pristine example set by Islam. Allah (swt) warns in the Qur'an,

"And do not devour your wealth amongst yourselves through falsehood, and do not offer bribes to the authorities so that you may knowingly devour a part of the wealth of other people with injustice" (Al-Baqarah: 188)

The second aspect relates to the fact that the underlying idea of democracy is itself flawed. People tend to view democracy through rose tinted glasses. They view it essentially as an opportunity to vote in or vote out a political party every four or five years. However this should not be called democracy but election and is shared (with differences in some of the details) amongst other political systems. However what is the essence of democracy is that people can define law. The principle behind democracy is that the majority decision is always the right one. This is not only extreme but also very dangerous. For example the majority in both America and Britain for decades denied women the vote, discriminated against blacks and denied workers basic rights. Therefore we have nothing within the democratic system to safeguard anything or anyone against the whims and prejudices of the majority of people. Indeed if the majority of people voted in a referendum that murder or racism be legalised then this would be democratic as this would represent the will of the people. It is this type of legislation setting process, subject to human beings whims whether it is singular (in a dictatorship) or collective (in a democracy) which is so dangerous to effective governance for the whole population. So it is evident that there in reality is little difference between a 'democracy' and a dictatorship. Both are run for the rich and powerful, and both involve men ruling over men with their desires and fancies. Consequently, both are just as oppressive as each other.

Allah (swt) say's in the Qur'an,

"And whoever does not rule by that which Allah has revealed, they are of the oppressors" (Al-Ma'idah: 45)

The only difference is that 'democracy' maintains a facade of legitimacy and is propagated around the world as the panacea to all problems. However this is nothing but hypocrisy as can be seen in the blatant support of these so called 'democratic' Governments for some of the most brutal military regimes and monarchies in the world. The U.S.'s supports for regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Chile in the past are cases in point. Accordingly, The US and other western nations conveniently ignore 'democracy' in foreign affairs when it is opposed to the fulfilling of their national interests.

The Islamic Khilafah state is neither a democracy nor a dictatorship, nor is it a monarchy or theocracy, it is unique. Muslims do not choose to apply the language of the western political scientists to describe their system. They call it the Khilafah and consider it to be Allah's (swt) law on earth. However, despite the sovereignty being for Allah (swt) the right of selecting a ruler, and putting him straight, lies firmly within the hands of the people. Man simply implements the laws of the Creator and Legislator, Allah (swt) and his Shari'ah. This ensures that nobody is above the law, including the Khaleefah. Consequently, the importance laid on electing the right man is minimal, because the law and peoples rights will be protected and remain the same regardless of who rules.his Islamic Khilafah was the state that, within a very short time, conquered two thirds of the known world, including the Roman (Byzantine) and Persian Empires. It was this state that within just 50 years had gone from a small town in Arabia to conquering the whole of North Africa. It shone as a beacon of light and advancement. It subjected man only to the will of Allah (swt) and not to any other mans desire. Soon, Insha-Allah, it will return to guide mankind towards the right path. Allah (swt) say's,

"Surely we have revealed to you the book (al-Qur'an) with the truth so that you may rule between mankind by that which Allah has shown you, so be not a pleader for the treacherous." (An-Nisa: 105) TMQ

[metacognative]

What is this crap? The mullahs and the schools say to kill infidels and heaven is a whorehouse. The founder of this 'religion' raped nine year olds and broke peace treaties. Who are you fooling? Yourself?

[knighthawk]

And the multi-culturalist proclaimed: "Thou shalt view all cultures to be created equal"

The koran states something the multi-culturists rsther hide from us:

Koran 003.110
YUSUFALI: Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted transgressors.
PICKTHAL: Ye are the best community that hath been raised up for mankind. Ye enjoin right conduct and forbid indecency; and ye believe in Allah. And if the People of the Scripture had believed it had been better for them. Some of them are believers; but most of them are evil-livers.
SHAKIR: You are the best of the nations raised up for (the benefit of) men; you enjoin what is right and forbid the wrong and believe in Allah; and if the followers of the Book had believed it would have been better for them; of them (some) are believers and most of them are transgressors.

[another cricket]

This intellectual basis, the Aqeedah, thus provides him with a distinct mentality and a true criterion for thoughts. It thus safeguards him against erroneous thought; he expels false thought and remains honest in his thought and sound in his comprehension.

To the point of executing a professor for saying that Mohammed’s parents were not Islamic because they died before Mohammed received his revelation.

That is logical isn't it?

It's like saying Moses wasn't Christian. Of course he wasn't, Christ came after Moses was dead.

But in Pakistan this is grounds for your being prosecuted and put to death for "Defaming the Prophet"

It is things like this that make me despair of peace. There is no common ground on which to build.

a.cricket

[Brasil]

I'm reading JIHAD IN THE WEST by Paul Fregosi and the goal of Islam culture is to rape, pillage and loot and they have been focused on that evil for 1400 years.