Skip to comments.
IRS Official to Judicial Watch: Clinton Enemies Were Audited
Newsmax ^
| April 23,2002
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 04/22/2002 10:00:48 PM PDT by Kay Soze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 641-655 next last
To: Luis Gonzalez
"It's time for you to go down Rebeckie."Hmmm...sounds like you have put a lot of thought into this one. Organized the entire coupe yet?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
""It is true that Bush and Ashcroft did not actually take part directly in the promotion of this guy..."---but, but...larry said they did!
Posted by FreedominJesusChrist
"It is true that the headline could have been clarified a little better, but it is not an outright lie."---it isn't exactly the truth either...is it?
Posted by FreedominJesusChrist
It's OK, it isn't an OUTRIGHT lie...and it's OK for JW to tell little lies...is that what you're saying here?
P.S. What part of not taking the Lord's name in vain do you not understand?
Have you figured out yet that's whjy some posters refer to you by any name other than your handle?
To: Luis Gonzalez
Luis, I understand that you are upset about my Banana boat comment, but do you or don't you have a sense of humor?
Really honey, you are starting to worry me with your high blood pressure and all.
But in all seriousness, most people call me by my old screename because they know it annoys me. And as for my faith and personal walk with Christ, I will let God be the judge of that and not you.
To: Luis Gonzalez
Judicial Watch was not lying in that headline, they were stretching a connection.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
So, you're dodging the questions?
They're still right there in front of you.
Is it OK for that headline to not tell the truth?
To: Luis Gonzalez
I am not dodging your questions Luis. The fact is that, that headline is not lying, the headline was stretching two connections.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
"Judicial Watch was not lying in that headline, they were stretching a connection."
Rebeckie
"It depends on the meaning of "is".
Bill Clinton
To: Luis Gonzalez
Now, that is REALLY stretching it.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
"Judicial Watch was not lying in that headline, they were stretching a connection."
"It is true that the headline could have been clarified a little better, but it is not an outright lie."
"It is true that Bush and Ashcroft did not actually take part directly in the promotion of this guy..."
Stretching a connection? Not an outright lie?
Quit telling me what it isn't and tell me what it is!
Is the headline the truth?
To: Luis Gonzalez
Well, for starters, I cannot begin to adequately apply to your interesting at best, comments, when you misquote Bill Clinton. Your grammar is quite incorrect and the period belongs in the quotation marks. When you have quotation marks in quotation marks, it is just one mark.
i.e. 'is.'"
To: FreedominJesusChrist
What you are doing is called the "rope-a-dope"...and you ain't no Ali little girl.
I am not interested in your editing skills or your grammatical proficiency.
Is the headline the truth?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
"I cannot begin to adequately apply to your interesting at best, comments, when you misquote Bill Clinton."Well, it isn't an outright misquote, is it?
I'm just "stretching" the truth...it's OK for Larry, isn't it?
To: Luis Gonzalez
"What you are doing is called the "rope-a-dope"...and you ain't no Ali little girl."Well, I am completely aware that I was sort of dodging your question, but for a darn good reason. Of course that Judicial Watch headline is telling the truth and I happen to believe that it is very eloquently telling the truth and I praise whoever wrote that! Whoever wrote that headline is the greatest, in my humble opinion. What a way to catch people's attention.
To: Luis Gonzalez
The only reason you were misquoting Bill Clinton is because your grammar was incorrect.
To: Luis Gonzalez
"It's time for you to go down Rebeckie."I am waiting for the melodramatic music to come on and then for you to break out into song and dance.
To: BeAChooser
I most certainly DO deny I ever said Linda Tripp lied during her deposition.
You posted what I said; the other conclusions are from your obsessed mind.
You are a dishonest poster. I've asked you at least five times to either produce the post of mine where I said she was a liar, or stop telling people I said it.
You have yet to do so; now it's time for you to admit you're not telling the truth, and stop posting that about me.
296
posted on
05/08/2002 3:14:22 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: BeAChooser
And note, folks, that Howlin STILL doesn't say that she believes Tripp ... only that she never called her "a liar". Produce it, or stop this dishonesty.
297
posted on
05/08/2002 3:15:07 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: BeAChooser
As usual, you're avoiding my question because it's NOT TRUE. If I were you, I wouldn't be posting that other posters are liars.
298
posted on
05/08/2002 3:16:04 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Gratutitous capitalization.
299
posted on
05/08/2002 3:18:36 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: BeAChooser
ME: BTW, I have NEVER typed the word JANOWSKI in my life until this very post.
YOU: You do know who Janowski is, don't you?
There you go again, avoiding my statement. I have NEVER discussed Janowski with you or anybody else, nor have I ever typed ANYTHING about Janowski, including her name. Produce it, or stop distorting.
You need to stop posting that.
300
posted on
05/08/2002 3:20:36 AM PDT
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 641-655 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson