You posted what I said; the other conclusions are from your obsessed mind.
You are a dishonest poster. I've asked you at least five times to either produce the post of mine where I said she was a liar, or stop telling people I said it.
You have yet to do so; now it's time for you to admit you're not telling the truth, and stop posting that about me.
Notice, folks, that even in her denial she can't utter the words "I don't believe Linda Tripp lied". Instead she just repeats the Clintonesque phrase "I ... snip ... deny I ever said " over and over and over and expects us to ignore the MEANING of what she posted on several occasions.
You posted what I said; the other conclusions are from your obsessed mind.
Well I admit that I am obsessed with the idea of Bush respecting the oath he took to see to it that the laws of this country are obeyed ... even by our leaders and their party members.
You are a dishonest poster. I've asked you at least five times to either produce the post of mine where I said she was a liar, or stop telling people I said it.
But how else are we to interpret your statement that matters such as Filegate were investigated and found to be about "nothing" ... unless you also think Tripp lied under oath? Why were the first words off your fingers after I listed the items supporting the allegation that crimes were committed in Filegate (where Tripp's was the most important deposition) that people lie all the time under oath. If you weren't implying that Tripp is a liar, then what were you implying?
You have yet to do so; now it's time for you to admit you're not telling the truth, and stop posting that about me.
Well from now on I'll be sure to write you IMPLIED that Tripp is a liar in her Filegate deposition. Satisfied?