Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS Official to Judicial Watch: Clinton Enemies Were Audited
Newsmax ^ | April 23,2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 04/22/2002 10:00:48 PM PDT by Kay Soze

IRS Official to Judicial Watch: Clinton Enemies Were Audited Carl Limbacher, NewsMax.com

Tuesday, April 23, 2002

An official with the Internal Revenue Service has admitted that legal opponents of former President Bill Clinton were singled out for tax audits, according to court documents made public this week. "What do you expect when you sue the president?" senior IRS official Paul Breslan told Judicial Watch, the Washington-based legal watchdog group that had filed 50-plus legal actions against the Clinton administration and subsequently found itself in the IRS's cross hairs.

Breslan's quote is cited in Judicial Watch's complaint against the tax agency, based on a host of what look to be politically inspired audits that make the worst abuses of the Nixon administration appear puny by comparison.

"There were literally six witnesses in the room when Breslan told us we should have expected an audit," Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman revealed to NewsMax.com. "Four of them were lawyers."

The legal group became the target of an IRS audit in 1998, just four days after it filed an independent impeachment report against Clinton, based on years of investigation into everything from Chinagate to the Paula Jones case.

But Judicial Watch wasn't alone. Witnesses bearing damaging testimony against the president were a favorite target of the Clinton IRS. Those singled out for audits include:

Leak

The Jones case, which would eventually lead to Clinton's impeachment, was of particular interest to the IRS, which apparently leaked her confidential tax returns to the late New York Daily News reporter Lars Erik Nelson.

In a September 1997 column Nelson revealed details from Jones' filing to bolster claims that she was profiting from her sexual harassment lawsuit against Clinton.

In a subsequent interview with NewsMax.com's Carl Limbacher (then with the Washington Weekly), Nelson insisted somewhat implausibly that a "friend" of Jones had come across her tax return during a visit to her home and decided to go public with the secrets.

Quite an Enemies List

As the Judicial Watch complaint notes, the Clinton IRS also went after organizations and even media companies it perceived as politically hostile, including:

The National Rifle Association, The Heritage Foundation, The National Review, The American Spectator, Freedom Alliance, National Center for Public Policy Research, American Policy Center, American Cause, Citizens Against Government Waste, Citizens for Honest Government, Progress and Freedom Foundation, Concerned Women for America and the San Diego Chapter of Christian Coalition.

Fox News Channel analyst Bill O'Reilly, a frequent critic of Bill and Hillary Clinton, has also pointed out how the IRS has repeatedly audited him.

The political nature of the Judicial Watch's audit seems particularly blatant.

"The IRS asked for our political affiliations in the first notice of audit," Klayman told NewsMax.

When he questioned why auditors wanted to know about the group's political ties, an IRS district director said the information had been deemed "relevant."

Worse still, each time Judicial Watch seemed to make legal headway against the White House, the IRS ratcheted up the pressure.

"When we would accomplish something big, like the criminal finding by Judge Royce Lamberth against Clinton in the Kathleen Willey Privacy Act case, our lawyers would get a call saying, 'We just want you to know that Judicial Watch is still on the IRS's radar screen,'" Klayman said.

"The same thing happened when we revealed the White House e-mail scandal," he added.

Shockingly, the IRS's intimidation tactics continue into the Bush administration, which has failed to sack Clinton's IRS Commissioner Charles Rosotti.

After Judicial Watch won the release of thousands of pages of documents from Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force last month, a badge-wearing IRS agent showed up at the group's offices.

A personal meeting between Klayman and Bush Justice Department Criminal Division chief Michael Chertoff, who led the Senate investigation into the Clintons' Whitewater abuses, failed to yield any interest in pursuing IRS abuses, which now threaten to tarnish the Bush administration.

When noted columnist Robert Novak inquired of the Justice Department about Judicial Watch's IRS complaint, he was told by a department official, "I don't know what we are going to do with this Klayman."

"When we were told that we were being audited because we sued Bill Clinton, we had no choice but to stand up and fight in court," Klayman said. "By leaving Charles Rossotti as IRS commissioner, Bush obviously is sending a signal that political audits are fine with him."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; clinton; clintonhaters; clintonscandals; democrats; irs; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 641-655 next last
To: Howlin
How much do you reckon the 'eWW' makes in a year? Don't forget to facton in cruises, trips abroad to file suits, trips to Miami, Dallas, West Coast to visit his vast spreading empire, etc...
421 posted on 05/08/2002 4:43:43 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: deport
How much do you reckon the 'eWW' makes in a year?

Doesn't he claim a salary of $250,000 just from Judicial Watch? I think I read that's what they pay him?

422 posted on 05/08/2002 4:47:26 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
$250,000, yes that's the 2000 form 990 filing which was a $43,000 per annum raise that year. So who knows what it is now, plus he has the law practice and who knows what else.....
423 posted on 05/08/2002 4:53:24 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; FreedominJesusChrist; BeAChooser
Are you squirming? I'm not. Let me know if you are; I'd like to know what it feels like.

LOL........not yet. I am nauseated that FR has been plagued with so many oddballs though.

I see that Rebeckie thinks I am fabricating the stories about the univited vistis that a few have received after posting bizarre things on this forum. That's too bad.

Oh well...... We tried.

424 posted on 05/08/2002 5:00:16 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
That sound you hear is my point going right over your head; if you make $250,000 a year, unless you're getting money from "somewhere else" you cannot afford an Italian villa.
425 posted on 05/08/2002 5:00:35 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Blah, Blah, Blah. I know that Klayman was probably independently wealthy before he started Judicial Watch.
426 posted on 05/08/2002 5:03:34 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
You should not make such statements and jeopardize this forum. This is not a joke.

ROFLOL!!! BWaahahahahahaha! Ooooh, add me to the slandering list you're gathering for the impeached RAPIST!!!! Oh my, did I just call him a RAPIST??!?! Let me ask you South, do you think he raped Broaddrick??? Do ya? Do ya? Do ya!? ROFLOLOLOLOLOLOL! Oh man, that just cracked me up! "This is not a joke". ROFLOL!!!! Help me I'm rolling over the desk and onto the floor!

What a maroooooooooon!
427 posted on 05/08/2002 5:06:40 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: deport; Amelia
Corrections.....

$43,000 should be $46,000+ per annum raise

428 posted on 05/08/2002 5:07:51 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Compared to clinton, Nixon was a prince.
429 posted on 05/08/2002 5:09:12 PM PDT by freepy smurf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Being the magnanimous person that I am, I accept your apologies. That's just the kind of sensitive, forgiving kind of guy that I am.

O.K., all right, it did wound me that my achievements went without comment by those of you who know me best and revere me most, but under the circumstances I must consider the situation in which you found yourself, and so..... I forgive you.

Just don't let it happen again.

Thinking proactively, if anyone on this thread has any suggestions about my Hallmark cards series, I would greatly appreciate hearing your suggestions. I think that the creative talent on this thread could come up with some real humdingers. ["In this hour of your despair at being sued by Larry Klayman, please know that we and every reasonablly informed person who has any information whatosever about this matter, is in total sympathy with you."]

Even if we just said "I'm sorry that you got sued by Judicial Watch," we would have a tremendous market.

While I am creative in the area of ideas, my graphics experience is scant. Maybe someone on these threads can make some contributions.
430 posted on 05/08/2002 5:11:22 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
You perhaps need a good suing.
431 posted on 05/08/2002 5:12:35 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
You're a guy? Gee you sounded like a daught..I mean a a girl.
432 posted on 05/08/2002 5:15:31 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Registered
"This is not a joke"

No, but you are and more and more are realizing that every time you post. If you weren't so deserving of their scorn, I'd almost feel sorry for you.

433 posted on 05/08/2002 5:22:27 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
LOL! ROFLOL. THIS IS NOT A JOKE
That was absolutely the funniest thing I have read this year. Oooo, Bill Clinton is going to take down FR and sue us for slander. BTW, do you believe Clinton is a rapist? Well?
434 posted on 05/08/2002 5:24:15 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: deport
Don't forget to factor in chauffeur-driven Mercedes which he calls "security" but is demonstrably not.
435 posted on 05/08/2002 5:25:24 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
BTW, according to Howlin only about 30 people that are reading this thread have the potential of thinking I am a joke.
436 posted on 05/08/2002 5:26:01 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Because we all know that Bill Clinton wants more scruntiny on his treason and crimes! LOL! Perhaps the cats' meows are getting in the way of a logical thought process.
437 posted on 05/08/2002 5:26:27 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
I doubt that.
438 posted on 05/08/2002 5:26:37 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
Ah, the sweet sounds of class envy.
439 posted on 05/08/2002 5:27:02 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
What was that JW Italian villa address? I want to Mapquest it.
440 posted on 05/08/2002 5:27:03 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 641-655 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson