IRS Official to Judicial Watch: Clinton Enemies Were Audited

Newsmax ^ | April 23,2002 | Carl Limbacher

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

I believe that Clinton hired a person or people to kill Ron Brown.

I'm no legal expert, but I think you might me dabbling in slander here, young lady. Unless you have evidence to PROVE this allegation, you better be careful.

You should not make such statements and jeopardize this forum. This is not a joke.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

I will assume that this post was addressed to me. For starters here are the news outlets that covered Rick Ramirez's case and the Elian memo:

The World Net Daily

Reuters

The Chicago Tribune

The LA Times

Newsmax

The Associated Press

WORLD Magazine

The Washington Post

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Hey Beck. Where's that evidence of your allegation?

[BeAChooser]

Now it is your turn. Do you believe that Ron Brown should be exhumed and autopsied, given the fact that the government's own expert pathologists say he had what appeared to be a bullet wound in his head and should have been autopsied?

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Now it is your turn.

Don't make me laugh. I barely acknowledge that you exist; let alone wait for you to give me my "turn".

Nice try........

[FreedominJesusChrist]

That is why I said, "I believe", instead of "Clinton did". Given the evidence that we have seen concerning Ron Brown's death, it is perfectly reasonable, ethical, and logical, for a considerable amount of reasonable doubt to exist in one's mind as to whether or not Brown was murdered by Clinton cronies because he was an extreme political liability. Given the unanswered questions concerning Brown's death and the evasiveness of the Clinton family, I believe that Clinton played a prime role in Brown's death.

No, you are no legal expert. It is not slander, or seditious libel for that matter, for me to believe that he was murdered by Clinton operatives. It would be an entirely different story however, for me to publically announce or publish a story saying that Clinton had his people murder Brown without any evidence of some sort.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

No, you are no legal expert

Nor are you, sweetie. It has been told that statements made here have prompted visits by those in charge of protecting the former presidents.

Like him or not, Clinton is a former president. Be careful !!!!!

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"Nor are you, sweetie. It has been told that statements made here have prompted visits by those in charge of protecting the former presidents."

I believe that, especially given some of the idiots on this forum. There is nothing, absolutely nothing wrong with me saying that I believe Clinton had his operatives murder Ron Brown. By saying this, I am not representing clear and present danger, I am not using fighting words, nor am I libeling anyone.

I am not a legal expert, but I have had a few classes in law enough to know that what I just said is perfectly fine!

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Beware of the knock on your door.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Whatever, you don't know what you're talking about.

[ChaseR]

"Oh, you'd like to think everybody knows about Klayman, but the vast majority of people don't."

That's all about to change...sit back, pull up a chair - and be patient. Bttt

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Yes, that will probably change soon, won't it?

[ChaseR]

"Beware of the knock on your door."
389 posted on 5/8/02 3:37 PM Pacific by Southflanknorthpawsis

Hysterical...simply hysterical...rofl.

[ChaseR]

"Beware of the knock on your door."

Let's all hurry -to chew our nails...too much, rofl.

[BeAChooser]

Unfortunately, on the forum, there are no "actions", just EXACT words.

Sorry, but there are actions on this forum all the time. You comment on one item but not another. That's an action. If nothing else, it illustrates how you prioritize the importance of those two items. There is also intent. Context matters (like writing that people lie all the time in response to a list of Filegate related depositions and their content). Hiding behind EXACT words is Clinton's approach to dealing with truth and viewpoints.

Why are you afraid to answer a simple question about whether you believe Brown was murdered or not?

If you believe he was murdered, then why are you so seemingly friendly with someone who says he was notand won't say how she came to that conclusion?

If you don't believe he was murdered then why don't you do what Howlin has not done ... provide a credible reason for that belief. I'm sure most Freepers would be interested and perhaps you can convince me with your facts and logic. I hold those two things dear.

Why are so seemingly friendly with someone who says she believes every word of Tripp's deposition in Filegate but also says that "gate" and others were investigated and found to be about "nothing"? Which is it? Do you believe Tripp or do you believe Filegate was investigated and found to be about "nothing"? I'm sure most Freepers would be very interested in your answer since it goes to your motive in attacking Klayman. Tell me that you believe Tripp and Bush should reopen the case, and I'll have nothing to say about your call for a Klayman audit ... as long as you don't pretend there's no possibility of political motivations being the reason for it.

I'm just saying that you are the company you keep ... isn't that the expression?

[ChaseR]

"Yes, that will probably change soon, won't it?"

Ain't no probably about it...

[Howlin]

In short, I am tired of your lies, distortions, smears, and gratuitous insults. Please go away, and do not post to me or about me any more.

That goes for me, too. Stop posting about me; you don't have to worry about me posting to you. I'm not going to.

Now, if you post to either of us again, you're just showing that this IS personal with you.

[BeAChooser]

Don't make me laugh.

You are not laughing but I am ... as I watch you and the rest of the move-on'ers squirm every which way to avoid answering that simple question ... as well as my questions about whose responsibility is it to investigate the crimes of the last administration and why that isn't happening.

RUNNNNING ... that's how democRATS deal with uncomfortable facts like those surrounding Ron Brown's death ... isn't it?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Yeah BeAChooser, you make me angry and upset too, especially when you ask me pesky questions about Clinton corruption and crimes that I either don't know about, don't care about, or don't want to answer. So don't talk to me, WAHHHH!!!!!!

[Iwo Jima]

"Oh, you'd like to think everybody knows about Klayman, but the vast majority of people don't." That's all about to change...sit back, pull up a chair - and be patient. Bttt

DO TELL! The only way that I can imagine that Larry Klayman would become known to people in general is if he were indicted for fraud and tax evasion and flee the country to his Italian villa, a la Robert Vesco, leaving Tom Fitton and his other confederates behind to face the legal buzzsaw. Tell us what you know about that possibility.