[FreedominJesusChrist]

That is why I said, "I believe", instead of "Clinton did". Given the evidence that we have seen concerning Ron Brown's death, it is perfectly reasonable, ethical, and logical, for a considerable amount of reasonable doubt to exist in one's mind as to whether or not Brown was murdered by Clinton cronies because he was an extreme political liability. Given the unanswered questions concerning Brown's death and the evasiveness of the Clinton family, I believe that Clinton played a prime role in Brown's death.

No, you are no legal expert. It is not slander, or seditious libel for that matter, for me to believe that he was murdered by Clinton operatives. It would be an entirely different story however, for me to publically announce or publish a story saying that Clinton had his people murder Brown without any evidence of some sort.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

No, you are no legal expert

Nor are you, sweetie. It has been told that statements made here have prompted visits by those in charge of protecting the former presidents.

Like him or not, Clinton is a former president. Be careful !!!!!

[BeAChooser]

It would be an entirely different story however, for me to publically announce or publish a story saying that Clinton had his people murder Brown without any evidence of some sort.

I wouldn't worry. The VERY LAST thing the Clinton's want is to draw attention to the circumstances surrounding the death of Ron Brown.

The idea of them suing over allegations that Brown was murdered and that their administration was somehow involved is ludicrous. That's because they and democRATS, in general, fear this case more than ANY other. That's why you can't get any of them to even comment on it ... especially those democRATS who control the mainstream media and those stealth democRATS that now infest this forum. And curiously enough, move-on'ers want to avoid the topic like the plague too. I wonder if there is a connection ....