Sorry, but there are actions on this forum all the time. You comment on one item but not another. That's an action. If nothing else, it illustrates how you prioritize the importance of those two items. There is also intent. Context matters (like writing that people lie all the time in response to a list of Filegate related depositions and their content). Hiding behind EXACT words is Clinton's approach to dealing with truth and viewpoints.
Why are you afraid to answer a simple question about whether you believe Brown was murdered or not?
If you believe he was murdered, then why are you so seemingly friendly with someone who says he was notand won't say how she came to that conclusion?
If you don't believe he was murdered then why don't you do what Howlin has not done ... provide a credible reason for that belief. I'm sure most Freepers would be interested and perhaps you can convince me with your facts and logic. I hold those two things dear.
Why are so seemingly friendly with someone who says she believes every word of Tripp's deposition in Filegate but also says that "gate" and others were investigated and found to be about "nothing"? Which is it? Do you believe Tripp or do you believe Filegate was investigated and found to be about "nothing"? I'm sure most Freepers would be very interested in your answer since it goes to your motive in attacking Klayman. Tell me that you believe Tripp and Bush should reopen the case, and I'll have nothing to say about your call for a Klayman audit ... as long as you don't pretend there's no possibility of political motivations being the reason for it.
I'm just saying that you are the company you keep ... isn't that the expression?
That goes for me, too. Stop posting about me; you don't have to worry about me posting to you. I'm not going to.
Now, if you post to either of us again, you're just showing that this IS personal with you.
I am also tired of you posting lies about my friend Howlin, making unsubstantiated comments about her, calling her names, and using your posts to me to insult her.
I am also tired of you carrying arguments from thread to thread in clear violation of the forum rules, which I've told you already on this thread. You still persist in trying to bring up arguments and from old threads. You've already admitted on another thread that you follow Howlin to these threads because she doesn't post on your Ron Brown threads.
I have tried to be polite, now I've had enough.