Posted on 04/22/2002 10:00:48 PM PDT by Kay Soze
IRS Official to Judicial Watch: Clinton Enemies Were Audited Carl Limbacher, NewsMax.com
Tuesday, April 23, 2002
An official with the Internal Revenue Service has admitted that legal opponents of former President Bill Clinton were singled out for tax audits, according to court documents made public this week. "What do you expect when you sue the president?" senior IRS official Paul Breslan told Judicial Watch, the Washington-based legal watchdog group that had filed 50-plus legal actions against the Clinton administration and subsequently found itself in the IRS's cross hairs.
Breslan's quote is cited in Judicial Watch's complaint against the tax agency, based on a host of what look to be politically inspired audits that make the worst abuses of the Nixon administration appear puny by comparison.
"There were literally six witnesses in the room when Breslan told us we should have expected an audit," Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman revealed to NewsMax.com. "Four of them were lawyers."
The legal group became the target of an IRS audit in 1998, just four days after it filed an independent impeachment report against Clinton, based on years of investigation into everything from Chinagate to the Paula Jones case.
But Judicial Watch wasn't alone. Witnesses bearing damaging testimony against the president were a favorite target of the Clinton IRS. Those singled out for audits include:
Leak
The Jones case, which would eventually lead to Clinton's impeachment, was of particular interest to the IRS, which apparently leaked her confidential tax returns to the late New York Daily News reporter Lars Erik Nelson.
In a September 1997 column Nelson revealed details from Jones' filing to bolster claims that she was profiting from her sexual harassment lawsuit against Clinton.
In a subsequent interview with NewsMax.com's Carl Limbacher (then with the Washington Weekly), Nelson insisted somewhat implausibly that a "friend" of Jones had come across her tax return during a visit to her home and decided to go public with the secrets.
Quite an Enemies List
As the Judicial Watch complaint notes, the Clinton IRS also went after organizations and even media companies it perceived as politically hostile, including:
The National Rifle Association, The Heritage Foundation, The National Review, The American Spectator, Freedom Alliance, National Center for Public Policy Research, American Policy Center, American Cause, Citizens Against Government Waste, Citizens for Honest Government, Progress and Freedom Foundation, Concerned Women for America and the San Diego Chapter of Christian Coalition.
Fox News Channel analyst Bill O'Reilly, a frequent critic of Bill and Hillary Clinton, has also pointed out how the IRS has repeatedly audited him.
The political nature of the Judicial Watch's audit seems particularly blatant.
"The IRS asked for our political affiliations in the first notice of audit," Klayman told NewsMax.
When he questioned why auditors wanted to know about the group's political ties, an IRS district director said the information had been deemed "relevant."
Worse still, each time Judicial Watch seemed to make legal headway against the White House, the IRS ratcheted up the pressure.
"When we would accomplish something big, like the criminal finding by Judge Royce Lamberth against Clinton in the Kathleen Willey Privacy Act case, our lawyers would get a call saying, 'We just want you to know that Judicial Watch is still on the IRS's radar screen,'" Klayman said.
"The same thing happened when we revealed the White House e-mail scandal," he added.
Shockingly, the IRS's intimidation tactics continue into the Bush administration, which has failed to sack Clinton's IRS Commissioner Charles Rosotti.
After Judicial Watch won the release of thousands of pages of documents from Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force last month, a badge-wearing IRS agent showed up at the group's offices.
A personal meeting between Klayman and Bush Justice Department Criminal Division chief Michael Chertoff, who led the Senate investigation into the Clintons' Whitewater abuses, failed to yield any interest in pursuing IRS abuses, which now threaten to tarnish the Bush administration.
When noted columnist Robert Novak inquired of the Justice Department about Judicial Watch's IRS complaint, he was told by a department official, "I don't know what we are going to do with this Klayman."
"When we were told that we were being audited because we sued Bill Clinton, we had no choice but to stand up and fight in court," Klayman said. "By leaving Charles Rossotti as IRS commissioner, Bush obviously is sending a signal that political audits are fine with him."
Please post my definitions of MURDER and MASS MURDER, along with links to where I posted them.
Auditing, auditing, auditing... a tough job but someone has to do it..... Just like monitoring gov't corruption is a tough job.....
You're right, I thought we were talking about suicide myself.
Don't read them or respond if they bother you.... simple isn't it.
This is still brought up by the leftists. Do you know of anyone who Nixon actually had audited for political purposes? I think that Nixon did more talking than actually doing corrupt things.
Well pardon me if I've gotten the mistaken impression that you agree with Howlin in thinking that Ron Brown was not murdered, and that Chinagate, Filegate etc. were properly investigated and turned out to be about "NOTHING"? If that isn't true, then by all means say so. We sure wouldn't want Howlin to think you agree with her on such serious matters, would we?
Only in that one's views on the Ron Brown matter may relate to one's credibility and motives for attacking Judicial Watch.
Also, please post where I've mentioned Ron Brown, Chinagate, or Filegate on this thread; otherwise I'll have to conclude that you are carrying arguments from thread to thread in clear violation of the rules.
Have you, of all people, forgotten Bill Clinton's sworn testimony?
Isn't that what you said when you were trying to dismiss the sworn testimony of Linda Tripp, Kathleen Janoski and all the others who were deposed in such matters as Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate and the death of Ron Brown ...
I say again, post it right here -- for all the world to see -- EXACTLY where I said Linda Tripp wasn't telling the truth. My exact words -- not something YOU assumed. This is at least my fourth or fifth request for you to POST my EXACT words where I insinuated Linda Tripp was lying under oath.
Post it or stop saying that. Let's see who's not telling the truth here.
*Rolling my eyes*
Apply IMMEDIATELY for a job at Judicial Watch; you'll fit right in.
I have NEVER seen anybody twist so many things to make Larry Klayman look good.
I am to the point with you that I can hardly wait for Klayman to be exposed just to see you explain it to us all.
The credibility and motives of a poster are certainly germaine to any discussion involving Klayman and the Clintons. Don't you agree? By your apparent friendliness with someone (Howlin) who has espoused views that seem ... well Clintonesque ... you open yourself to scrutiny. I'm simply asking where you stand with regards to the validity of the Clinton-related crimes that Klayman helped expose (which is probably why he was audited in the first place). If your views aren't consistent in that regard, as Howlin's aren't, then perhaps the readers of this thread may reassess your dislike of Judicial Watch.
Let's have them once and for all. Put up or shut up about it.
Also again, please post where I've mentioned Ron Brown, Chinagate, or Filegate on this thread; otherwise I'll have to conclude that you are carrying arguments from thread to thread in clear violation of the rules.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.